jjhnsn@ut-ngp.UUCP (03/13/84)
I propose net.micro.apple.68k as an alternative to net.micro.apple.lisa
or net.micro.apple.mac
James Lee Johnson, U.T. Computation Center, Austin, Texas 78712
ARPA: jjhnsn@ut-ngp
UUCP: {ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!ut-ngp!jjhnsnkds@intelca.UUCP (Ken Shoemaker) (03/15/84)
I really would prefer not to put these groups under net.micro.apple,
which typically is cluttered up with drivel concerning the apple II
and its ilk, which I, personally, couldn't care less about!
(no offense.....)
--
Ken Shoemaker, Intel, Santa Clara, Ca.
{pur-ee,hplabs,ucbvax!amd70,ogcvax!omsvax}!intelca!kdsmats@dual.UUCP (Mats Wichmann) (03/16/84)
If we are playing `network caucuses' here, I would have to agree that
I would rather NOT see the Mac / Lisa discussion moved to
net.micro.apple - the stuff going on there now interests me not at
all, while the Lisa and the Mac DO interest me. There has to be
some other answer - net.68k does not seem right either - the fact that
both machines use the 68k is not really relevant to the discussions
that have been going on about them? How about a subgroup of net.works?
They have some of the characteristics...probably not a good idea, though.
Does ANYBODY have a good idea of where to put them?
Mats Wichmann
Dual Systems Corp.
...{ucbvax,amd70,ihnp4,cbosgd,decwrl,fortune}!dual!mats
It now became apparent (despite the lack of library paste)
that something had happened to the vicar; [ Edward Gorey ]