[comp.protocols.iso] Object Identifiers for TCP and UDP?

barns@GATEWAY.MITRE.ORG (02/01/90)

It's hard to prove a negative, but I have to believe the answer is No.
The logical places under the object identifier tree do not have
registration authorities solidified yet.  It's hard to figure what
the best place for it is, but it seems like it would have to be under
an ICD or under a US construct.  NIST OIW seems like an improbable
home, which leaves ICD 5 or 6 as plausible candidates, and registration
procedures there are not yet firmed up (although I think it's getting
close).  ANSI registration of Organizations (under country code US=840)
also ought to be pretty close, but not quite there, unless something
happened within the last few weeks.  I wonder whether the IAB is
capable of coming up with the $$$ to get an ANSI Org ID of their own.
That approach would circumvent the politics of getting some part of the
government to register it.

There are unofficial but generally used object identifiers for TCP/IP
MIB objects as defined in RFC 1066.  I don't think this is what you
were really asking for, but you could check it out anyway.  There is
no adopted mechanism for defining things "officially" under ICD 6 but
the MIB people needed something and plunged on anyway.

/Bill Barns

karl@asylum.sf.ca.us (Karl Auerbach) (02/02/90)

> There are unofficial but generally used object identifiers for TCP/IP
> MIB objects as defined in RFC 1066.

I believe that the internet MIB object identifiers (including the
enterprise subtree) are assigned by a legitimate chain of naming
authorities descending from ISO.  Consequently, these are as
"official" and valid as any you could get from ANSI or any other body.
The system is in place now.  And there is no charge to get a number.

				--karl--