Communications@sri-unix (07/08/82)
A copy of your message is being returned, because: "R-OPTION" at MIT-MC is an unknown recipient. Message not sent. Failed message follows: ------- Date: 8 Jul 1982 0123-EDT From: Mel Pleasant <WORKS at RUTGERS> Subject: WORKS Digest V2 #63 Sender: PLEASANT at RUTGERS To: WorkS: ; Reply-To: WORKS at RUTGERS WorkS Digest Thursday, 8 July 1982 Volume 2 : Issue 63 Today's Topics: What does DEC Want with 1000 Mice??? (2 msgs) Cheap Track Balls? $68K Question End User Interface Query Defining the Next Generation MicroComputer Operating System Mailing-List for "List of lists" Update Notices ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 30 June 1982 23:37-EDT From: Steven T. Kirsch <SK at MIT-MC> Subject: What is DEC doing with 1,000 mice? By early next year, DEC will have over a thousand mice. Does anyone know what they will be used on? A graphics terminal perhaps? I heard their Smalltalk effort was a failure (too slow). ------------------------------ Date: 2 July 1982 02:13-EDT From: Steven T. Kirsch <SK at MIT-MC> Subject: Mice at DEC I just found out that the mice are for the VAX Station 100. ------------------------------ Date: 30 Jun 82 17:55:34-PDT (Wed) From: decvax!utzoo!utcsrgv!ralph at Berkeley Subject: Cheap track balls? Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.446 We are looking for a tracker ball for our human factors lab. We have found one at $4000! I find it hard to believe that video games use devices that are of this quality and price. Therefore, anyone know of a source of cheaper track balls? thanks ralph hill computer systems research group University of Toronto 10 King's College Road Toronto Ontario Canada M5S 1A4 ...!decvax!utzoo!utcsrgv!ralph ------------------------------ Date: 2 Jul 82 0:29:50-EDT (Fri) From: Frank J Wancho <wancho@BRL> Subject: $68K Question After wading through the intermixed series of exchanges on the MC68000 "page fault problem" some time back, I was recently asked what the outcome was, and I wasn't sure. Would someone care to briefly summarize without starting another flame series (if that's possible)? The reason for concern here is that some people are proposing to standardize on the Motorola "68" family, possibly into the late '90's. That bothers me alot - not just because of the discussion referred to above, but because hardware is not the thing you want to standardize - and maybe not software either - at least not for the next twenty years! Five years - maybe. Anyway, the second question was: how well done are the current implementations of the 68000 in handling the supposed page fault "problem", especially, the Unix ports. Does the Z8000 series fare better in this aspect? What should we look out for when evaluating these systems for use in small-scale (4-6 user) environments? --Frank ------------------------------ Date: 2 Jul 82 10:55:22-PDT (Fri) From: decvax!harpo!eagle!mhuxt!mhuxa!mhuxh!mhuxm!pyuxjj!pyuxcc!adi at Berkeley Subject: Query : End user interface Article-I.D.: pyuxcc.285 Does anyone in the <net-land> have some experience or thoughts on the question below ? Given an intelligent terminal or local/personal computer with graphics capability (including mouse and/or touchpad devices), which of the following is a preferred way to put an application together for a non-computer but technical user ? (i.e. the user is a college graduate, perhaps in EE, ME, or some other engineering or related field, but has had very little contact with computers.) 1. A powerful command language ( a la Unix ) 2. menu driven application - usually single letter or single word responses required. 3. menu driven - menu consisting of graphics characters 4. menu driven, but allowing pointing to an entry by the pointing device 5. Some other method (please explain) If you have direct answers or some pointers to literature (preferably making definite recommendations), please respond by mail. Please accept my thanks in anticipation. A. D. Ingle ...!pyuxcc!adi ------------------------------ Date: 5 Jul 82 18:13:45-PDT (Mon) From: menlo70!sri-unix!hplabs!Peter at Berkeley Subject: defining the next generation microcomputer operating system Article-I.D.: hplabs.518 It is becoming clear that the state of teh personal computer, and for that matter, the small business computer, is becoming limited not by the hardware that abounds in the field, but by the software that has, in some glaring examples, been written by individuals or groups that appear to have had little idea of what the market desired. Operating systems for microcomputers (at least the two leading ones, CP/M and Unix, and their respective generics) have been greatly maligned, to the point where one wonders when someone will set out to define and implement something better. I would like to do just that. However, one way to avoid the problems of the "first generation" operating systems that have prevailed in the past is to look at the market FIRST. What I am wondering is: how many individuals out there who use microcomputers regularly would be willing to attend a semi-formal conference with, say, a scheduled 20-30 hours of meeting time, with the specific intent of formulating a specification for the next generation operating system. The intent is to base the system on what the conference attendees decide is the need of the current and future market. I am willing to organize such a conference if there is a reasonable amount of interest in attending. I would like to limit the attendance to less than 5 individuals, if at all reasonable. Probably the best way to do so would be to limit attendance to San Francisco Bay area professionals. (Any thoughts on this?) In any case, if you have any interest in this at all, send me mail, and I will be glad to provide more details; things are currently in the idea stage only. Peter Henry hplabs!pdh PDH@SAIL (Arpanet) real mail: Peter D. Henry PO Box 9932 Palo Alto, CA 94305 ------------------------------ Date: 6 Jul 1982 2330-PDT From: Zellich at OFFICE-3 (Rich Zellich) Subject: Mailing-list for "List of lists" update notices cc: ZELLICH For those of you not previously aware of it, I maintain a master list of ARPANET mailing-lists/digests/discussion groups (currently 756 lines or ~29,000 characters) on OFFICE-3 in file: <ALMSA>INTEREST-GROUPS.TXT For ARPANET users, OFFICE-3 supports the net-standard ANONYMOUS login within FTP, with any password. To keep people up to date on the large number of such lists, I have established a mailing list for list-of-lists \update notices/. I do not propose to send copies of the list itself to the world at large, but for those ARPANET users who seriously intend to FTP the updated versions when updated, I will send a brief notice that a new version is available. For those counterparts at internet sites who maintain or redistribute copies for their own networks (DECNet, Xerox, etc.) and can't reach the master by ARPANET FTP, I will send out the complete new file. I do \not/ intend to send file copies to individual users, either ARPANET or internet; our system is fairly heavily loaded, and we can't afford it. There is no particular pattern to the update frequency of INTEREST- GROUPS.TXT; I will occasionally receive a burst of new mailing-lists or perhaps a single change of address for a host or mailing-list coordinator, and then have a long period with no changes. To get on the list, send requests to ZELLICH@OFFICE-3, \not/ to the mailing-list this message appears in. Cheers, Rich ------------------------------ End of WorkS Digest ******************* -------