[comp.windows.misc] Why I'm suspicious of comp.windows.misc experts

north@hector.UUCP (Stephen C. North) (02/13/88)

would anyone that has written at least a few nontrivial
interactive graphics programs in both X and NeWS care to
comment?  i realize it's a lot easier to just post articles
that say "i haven't tried <whatever> but i'm sure if i did i
wouldn't like it and besides although i haven't looked at a
single line of code i know the implementation is very
machine dependent or at least utterly bogus."  still the
believability of such testimonials is somewhat questionable.
Parturiunt montes, nascetur ridiculus mus!

mh@wlbr.EATON.COM (Mike Hoegeman) (02/15/88)

I've been using NeWS for about 3 or 4 months now (version 1.0) and I'm
extremely impressed with it. The only previous window system I've worked
with (other than just playing around) is the Mac window stuff.  I definitely 
would take NeWS over the Mac toolbox any day. Some of my co-workers have used 
MS windows and X-windows. They also prefer NeWS. The NeWS extensions to 
postscript are pretty seamless and do not strike you as being "warts". 

As far as portability goes, I've taken a cursory look at the NeWS server
code and it looks like ALOT of effort went into making NeWS portable.
NeWS looks like it was designed to be portable from day one. I don't
know too much about X11 but if it's anything like the X10 code, NeWS
wins hands down portability-wise.