oscar@utcsrgv.UUCP (Oscar M. Nierstrasz) (01/07/84)
Another YES vote for net.records being absorbed by net.music.
Oscar Nierstrasz
--
# UUCP: { allegra cornell decvax decwrl floyd ihnp4 linus
# sask ubc-vision utzoo uw-beaver watmath } !utcsrgv!oscardya@unc-c.UUCP (01/09/84)
References: utcsrgv.3058 Why not....I Agree 100 percent (since unc-c does not get net.records.) Now, if we got them to absorb net.audio as well (and net.audio.soft ?) dya
naftoli@aecom.UUCP (Robert Berlinger) (01/10/84)
Another YES for combining net.records and net.music.
--
Robert Berlinger
...{philabs,cucard,pegasus}!aecom!naftoli
"If you're not where you are, you're nowhere"jdd@allegra.UUCP (John DeTreville) (01/12/84)
I would like to suggest that, in all cases where the fate of a newsgroup is
being discussed, the discussion also be posted to the newsgroup in question.
I'm sure that there are many people who read net.records who do not read
net.news.group.
Cheers,
John ("Although I'm Not One Of Them") DeTreville
Bell Labs, Murray Hillucbesvax.turner@ucbcad.UUCP (01/14/84)
#R:utcsrgv:-305800:ucbesvax:6600015:000:153 ucbesvax!turner Jan 7 18:17:00 1984 Add another YES vote for merging net.music and net.records. I like both, but I get tired of having to read. --- Michael Turner (ucbvax!ucbesvax.turner)
rdg@hpcnoa.UUCP (01/21/84)
#R:utcsrgv:-305800:hpcnoa:2100002:000:266 hpcnoa!rdg Jan 17 17:01:00 1984 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!!! To suggest that net.audio should be merged with net.music is ridiculous - the things discussed in the two groups are totally divergent. Rob Gardner hpfcla!hpcnoa!rdg
chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach) (05/03/84)
>Hey!!! > >Whatever happened to net.records??? Net.records went away a couple of months ago. Some unnamed person (known only by his plaid cape) pointed out that almost every message in net.records was also cross linked into net.music. After discussion it was decided that there was no real practical difference between the two, and net.records was nuked so that there was a single topic for use in discussion. It should be noted that some sites seem to have forgotten to remove net.records from their active file so some sites seem to be posting to it still on occasion. Of course, most people never see these postings (*hint*). >Did I miss something (I have been on vacation) or am I the only >person who reads this network. I like having a seperate net for >album reviews. Does anyone else feel the same way? Many of us read this network. When you consider how long it took you to notice, think about how useful net.records truly was. It was a good idea, but in reality there was nothing about it that made it different from net.music or net.audio (for the technical material). >It appears that to gain one network (net.music.classical), we have >lost another. Not true, since net.records went away long before net.music.classical was even considered. chuq -- From high above Benden weyr, Ch'qui, rider of the plaid dragon Plugh! Chuq Von Rospach {amd70,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4}!nsc!chuqui (408) 733-2600 x242 ninety nine dead baboons, sitting in my living room...