CStacy@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM (Christopher Stacy) (01/30/91)
eDlhM Xq22L EaEGp GqvYT 6A0jB mgAXc Ab4Dp UZoGi snpcs ScgWA JRKBk ZZB0u RJgYo gu7MD zGR45 JsTuQ dFvnE zPY#P eQuia drGc6 AhWyN oelmo abr3f TvHj5 gK7sp 1lAD4 ckRVe p0YNe 5rQwN BJxjw PDy8O O%PLy M9NfA 2KnvH aaz1D Uqdcf 3dFT1 tkHPv m5i%8 xws#t VgWd8 zv2cO R5zI3 bNkEo yc6Uz 55#q4 MV6v4 fIrP2 KMSia ZODTu a#8b8 RXHtO zJssL 1VSQ9 m9NnY qjy3G CU7LG w5UwG 9QXT7 wAS32 xS9rU pTwEV ZQFAO zg5ka oat98 3Yf5s BR9ud pGos% QKQks zEYfr owiB5 K4KDn ypcaI x7ioF ZxXU0 gcIUX lZe58 x4kFs eht6b Mhh2f pEfsf ZAfNE J#HI4 Z7AWq QNDIA Xnjgr 2jSp5 8PwUc VFzzw cVTeA Ys4Ee QMQXv vMsAK EUphS fpoGF QM1bR kCjUY VpjVD dMzNI 1wybW J%r8b MeFgv iQDHc yUkcj Z6SBL 8s4J6 bG5xX 9BPkG 8IvRF XlBU0 jAGKX #Ak3j kJWQe u00px PgAdf lZS82 4xEYg mfFe2 eR94Q jhpCy 9KFUY hPpq1 kNNrS ga0N8 VQw6# 48MVx UUZW9 Ingmp hvRS# g7#Iq Rh5Nh 63d5g pf8vx Vg3Qh oJm1j raav5 xQvtW 3H5rO jEU%D iRQyf xaVYK oQmwB 4bw5Y iv59d B6yHf k1aB# LLlI2 i8kaN 9wA1L QvI1A zJg4H xaAY In the above message, David Brownell writes about how very hard it would be to have encrypted mail, and I reply, "What's the big deal?" Seriously though, this feature has been available for over a decade in the mail agent that I am using, and I'm know there are others. The author can choose from multiple encryption techniques, and the header simply says which one the receiving mail-reader should apply. The network is not involved at all. The mail transport agents don't do anything special, but they also don't secret the fact of communication; that would obviously require more cooperation. But functions for just keeping your message contents secure have long been commonly available. Christopher