[comp.society] Article: Reading 'All About' Computerization

kling@ics.uci.edu (Rob Kling) (06/17/91)

Note: This is a long article of about 1420 lines. Please address any
comments to the author at the adresses listed below. This first file of
3 contains just the abstract.
                                 ------

                 Reading "All About"  Computerization:
                 Five Common Genres of Social Analysis

                               Rob Kling


             Department of Information and Computer Science
                        University of California
                            Irvine, CA 92717
                           kling@ics.uci.edu
                              714-856-5955
                              August 1990


                                ABSTRACT

This paper examines unstated, but critical, social assumptions which
underlie analyses of computerization. It focuses on the popular,
professional and scholarly literature which claims to describe the
actual nature of computerization, the character of computer use, and
the social choices and changes that result from computerization.  This
literature can be usefully segmented five ideal type genres: utopian,
anti-utopian, social realism, social theory, and analytical reduction.
Each genre is characterized and illustrated. The strengths and
weaknesses of each genre are de-scribed. In the 1990s, there will be a
large market for social analyses of computerization. Utopian analyses
are most likely to dominate the popular and professional discourse. The
empirically oriented accounts of social realism, social theory and
analytical reduction, are likely to be much less common and also less
commonly seen and read by computer professionals and policy-makers.
These genres are relatively subtle, portray a more ambiguous world, and
have less rhetorical power to capture the imagination of readers.  Even
though they are more scientific, these empirically anchored genres
don't seem to appeal to many scientists and engineers. It is ironic
that computing -- often portrayed as an instrument of knowledge -- is
primarily the subject of discourses whose knowledge claims are most
suspect. Conversely, the discourses whose claims as valid knowledge are
strongest seems to have much less appeal in the mass media and
technological communities.

To appear in: Directions in Advanced Computer Systems, 1990. Doug
     Schuler, (Ed.) Norwood, N.J. Ablex Publishing Co.

--