geoff@eagle_snax.UUCP ( R.H. coast near the top) (09/10/88)
Since my posting last week suggesting the formation of comp.protocols.nfs,
I've received unanimous support for the idea from dozens of sources, most
saying "...and if you issue a Call for Votes, please treat this as a
YES vote". [To answer the obvious question, I've excluded Sun
respondents from the audit, otherwise things might get skewed.] Anyway,
it seems appropriate to issue a formal call for votes at this point.
Those who have already sent proxies need not re-mail.
Again, please use the sun!garnold or garnold@sun.com addresses rather
than following my Baroque news path.
Thanks.
Geoff Arnold
PC-NFS architect
--
Geoff Arnold, Sun Microsystems Inc.+------------------------------------------+
PC Distrib. Sys. (home of PC-NFS) |If you do nothing, you will automatically |
UUCP:{hplabs,decwrl...}!sun!garnold|receive our Disclaimer of the Month choice|
ARPA:geoff@sun.com +------------------------------------------+ross@SWORD.ULOWELL.EDU (Ross Miller) (09/15/88)
I do not think it should be called comp.protocols.nfs as this is not what nfs is. Please count my no vote. Ross
efb@suned1.UUCP (Everett F. Batey II) (09/23/88)
I favor and vote yes for comp.protocols.nfs
--
suned1!efb@elroy.JPL.Nasa.Gov sun!tsunami!suned1!efb efbatey@NSWSES.ARPA
Any statements / opinions made here are mine, alone, not those of the
United States, the DoD, the Navy, the Congress, the Judiciary, nor ... rcsmith@anagld.UUCP (Ray Smith) (09/23/88)
In article <708@suned1.UUCP> suned1!efb@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (Everett F. Batey II) writes: >I favor and vote yes for comp.protocols.nfs >-- Ditto. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ray Smith | ...!uunet!mimsy!aplcen!\ Analytics, Inc. | ...!netsys!---anagld!rcsmith Suite 200 | ...!ethos! / 9891 Broken Land Parkway | Columbia, MD 21046 | Voice: (301) 381-4300 Fax: (301) 381-5173 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=