[comp.protocols.misc] Other fun arguments

sjs@jcricket.ctt.bellcore.com (Stan Switzer) (10/27/88)

In article <570@interlan.UUCP> backman@interlan.UUCP (Larry Backman) writes:
> 	This argument is fun, its one of those religious wars that has no
> 	correct answer.  Another good one (next time) is the correct hardware
> 	architecture needed to do fastt protocols.

And after we thrash that one out we might consider the question of the
correct protocol architecture for fast communications.

Speaking only for myself,

Stan Switzer  sjs@ctt.bellcore.com