lynch@theory.tn.cornell.edu (Tim Lynch) (10/16/90)
I notice a lot of references to Rutger's version of CAP. Can someone point out to me why Rutger's version is preferred? (I've been away from this group for several months.) Also, where is it located? Thanks. Tim Lynch, Mann Library systems manager
scarpell@cnca-cam.fr (Claude Scarpelli) (10/17/90)
In article <1990Oct15.183517.1859@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> lynch@theory.tn.cornell.edu (Tim Lynch) writes: >I notice a lot of references to Rutger's version of CAP. Can >someone point out to me why Rutger's version is preferred? >(I've been away from this group for several months.) Also, >where is it located? > >Thanks. > >Tim Lynch, Mann Library systems manager Rutgers CAP don't need any Kinetics box : Unix host understand Appletalk packets, without any encapsulation. It's a good way to connect Mac and Unix, when Mac are directly on ethernet. Bugs: Rutgers CAP (like all CAP programs) don't speak Phase 2 Claude Scarpelli