ladkin@KESTREL.ARPA.UUCP (06/02/87)
stevan harnad writes guardedly: > perhaps there was an element of incoherence in all but the most > technical and restricted of signal-analytic candidates. for the record, my suggestion was not signal-analytic, and no-one showed any element of technical incoherence. however, it was met with resounding uninterest, since it was a distinction from logic. since most people want an inherent distinction, i.e. one that maintains under translations and coding, my suspicion is still that technical logic and complexity theory, not signal processing, is the place to look for a solution. peter ladkin ladkin@kestrel.arpa