[comp.ai.digest] Drexler and Nanotechnology

JJD.MDC@OFFICE-1.ARPA.UUCP (06/25/87)

Sorry I missed the NPR report on K. Eric Drexler and _Engines of Creation_.  
Here's some background:

The book _Engines of Creation_ was publixhed by Anchor Press / Doubleday in 
1986.  The excited foreword is by Marvin Minsky.  I know from the copy that I 
just checked out that Drexler discusses AI in the book, but I am not sure what 
his vantage point is.  At minimum, of course, is the potential of 
nanotechnology as a way to build much denser hardware.  I suspect that Drexler 
also at least touches on the idea of this enabling a critical mass and 
consciousness.  This will come later.  It's a good read.

The book was excerpted in the Spring 1987 issue of _Whole Earth Review_.  This 
article is provocative and has some good conceptual illustrations.

The cover bio of Drexler identifies him as a "Research Affiliate at the MIT 
Space Systems Laboratory."  He is pictured with his back to the camera, staring
at an imposing and eclectic pile of books and a terminal.

I first encountered Drexler in the pages of the Summer 1976 issue of 
_CoEvolution Quarterly_ (ancestor of _Whole Earth Review_).  The theme of that 
issue (later extended as a book) was Gerard O'Neill's concept of space 
colonization and industrialization.  Drexler was a very articulate advocate who
was actually doing something about it.  He was a graduate student at the time, 
and had built a six-foot-long track that could electromagnetically launch a 
bucket of water into a wall at 80 miles per hour.  It was a demonstration of 
the feasibility of a mass driver to be built on the moon and to launch 10 
kilogram sacks of material to colony construction sites.  He contributed to the
book that came from the initial article, demolishing his opponents with gleeful
arrogance (apparently since moderated, perhaps by exposure to audiences in the 
last few years).

I suspect that Drexler has a general interest in big fixes in answer to 
contemporary dilemmas, motivating his fascination with both space 
industrialization and with nanotechnology.  More specifically, his earlier 
interest in space has probably driven his interest in nanotechnology.  
Nanotechnology promises to revolutionize both the ways things are made, and 
their resulting performance characteristics.  It makes vast systems of 
capital-intensive, high-performance technology seems more approachable.

I leave further analysis to the next century's graduate theses re: contemporary
intellectual history.