sas@BFLY-VAX.BBN.COM (07/02/87)
Actually, many studies have been done on time perception. One rather interesting one reported some years back in Science showed that time and size scale together. Smaller models (mannikins in a model office setting) move faster. It was kind of neat paper to read. I agree that AI suffers from a decidedly non-scientific approach. Even when theoretical physicists flame about liberated quarks and the anthropic principle, they usually have some experiments in mind. In the AI world we get thousands of bytes on the "symbol grounding problem" and very little evidence that symbols have anything to do with intelligence and thought. (How's that for Drano[tm] on troubled waters?) There have been a lot of neat papers on animal (and human) learning coming out lately. Maybe the biological brain hackers will get us somewhere - at least they look for evidence. Probably overstating my case, Seth