[comp.ai.digest] Burning Bruno

JMC@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU (John McCarthy) (08/25/88)

Date: Tue, 23 Aug 88 01:12 EDT
From: John McCarthy <JMC@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>
Subject: Burning Bruno
To: AIList@AI.AI.MIT.EDU

[In reply to message sent Mon 22 Aug 1988 22:21-EDT.]

Burning  Giordano Bruno presents problems for many religions that Hiroshima
doesn't present for science.  Science doesn't claim that scientific
discoveries can't be used in war.  There would be problems for anyone
who claimed that 1930s science would avert World War II.  As far as
I know, not one person in the world made that claim.  There are also
problems for people who claimed that Marxism was a science, that
countries ruled by Marxism would not commit crimes and that
the Soviet Union was ruled by Marxism.  Plenty of people believed
that and denied that, for example, the millions murdered as kulaks
were murdered.

A religion that claimed that the Catholic Church was protected
from doing evil by God, that the Catholic Church was responsible
for the killing of Bruno and that killing Bruno was a crime
have problems.  Many other religious people who believe that
God will prevent their leaders from certain crimes and errors
have problems every time one of them is caught.

To have problems of this kind requires a certain complex of
beliefs, but such complexes are relatively common.  If certain
people were found to have committed certain crimes, it would
disconcert me a lot.