jbn@GLACIER.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle) (09/26/88)
Use of the term "common-sense reasoning" presupposes that common sense has something to do with reasoning. This may not be the case. Many animals exhibit what appears from the outside to be "common sense". Even insects seem to have rudiments of common sense. Yet at this level reasoning seems unlikely. The models of behavior expressed by Rod Brooks and his artificial insects (there's a writeup on this in the current issue of Omni), and by Hans Moravec in his new book "Mind Children", offer an alternative. I won't attempt to summarize that work here, but it bears looking at. I would encourage workers in the field to consider models of common sense that don't depend heavily on logic. There are alternative ways to look at this class of problem. Both Brooks and Moravec use approaches that are spatial in nature, rather than propositional. This seems to be a good beginning for dealing with the real world. The energetic methods Witkin and Kass use in vision processing are another kind of model which offers a spatial orientation, an internal drive toward consistency, and the ability to deal with noisy data. These are promising beginnings for common-sense processing. John Nagle