hack@bellboy.UUCP (Greg Hackney) (05/26/88)
I just rec'd a copy of the Elm 2.0 beta today. In the distribution notes, r$ writes that David Taylor says this will probably be the last release of Elm. Question: Is this to say that because David Taylor chooses to drop the support of Elm, there should be no more releases? Since Elm is public domain, can't (and shouldn't) the public issue bug releases on it's own? Dave's distribution notice says, "You may without additional permission from the author, distribute Elm or components of Elm, with or without additions developed by you or by others at no charge." *Elm is a trademark of David Taylor -- Greg
mechjgh@tness1.UUCP (Greg Hackney 214+464-2771) (06/04/88)
In article <1043@bellboy.UUCP> hack@bellboy.UUCP (I) write: >I just rec'd a copy of the Elm 2.0 beta today. In the >distribution notes, r$ writes that David Taylor >says this will probably be the last release of Elm. Correction. The above comment was in release 1.7, not 2.0. 2.0 was never officially posted to comp.unix.sources. -- Greg