len@netsys.UUCP (Len Rose) (05/19/88)
I will put it on ames for anyone who wants to ftp it..
I will let you know when I get it online.
(I just got it from ulowell myself)
Len
--
Len Rose - len@ames.arc.nasa.gov
or {ames,decuac,ihnp4}!netsys!len
"This better not be haga!"hack@bellboy.UUCP (Greg Hackney) (05/20/88)
In article <8475@netsys.UUCP> len@netsys.UUCP (Len Rose) writes: > >I will put it on ames for anyone who wants to ftp it.. >I will let you know when I get it online. >(I just got it from ulowell myself) >Len Len, If you will break it in pieces and uucp it to rutgers!bellcore!tness7!root, then I will see to it that Bill Wisner gets it to put on killer. (killer is a major uucp archive site). -- Greg
len@netsys.UUCP (Len Rose) (05/21/88)
I have already sent it to Charley at killer.
We have a direct uucp link..
Len
--
Len Rose - len@ames.arc.nasa.gov
or {ames,decuac,ihnp4}!netsys!len
"This better not be haga!"jv@mhres.mh.nl (Johan Vromans) (06/05/88)
Here we go again:
How to obtain elm 2.0 gamma, especially in Europe?
If there is a "bugs & remarks" coordinator, can't he post it?
--
Johan Vromans | jv@mh.nl via European backbone
Multihouse N.V., Gouda, the Netherlands | uucp: ..{uunet!}mcvax!mh.nl!jv
"It is better to light a candle than to curse the darkness"robert@pvab.UUCP (Robert Claeson) (06/13/88)
In article <1910@mhres.mh.nl>, jv@mhres.mh.nl (Johan Vromans) writes: > How to obtain elm 2.0 gamma, especially in Europe? > > If there is a "bugs & remarks" coordinator, can't he post it? No big idea, unless you've got UNIX sources. Elm 2.0 requires the crypt() function, which is *not* distributed outside of the U.S.
jrmacmillan@lily.waterloo.edu (John R. MacMillan) (06/17/88)
In article <242@pvab.UUCP> robert@pvab.UUCP (Robert Claeson) writes: |No big idea, unless you've got UNIX sources. Elm 2.0 requires the crypt() |function, which is *not* distributed outside of the U.S. Requires it?? Is this a deeply ingrained dependency or can I just #ifdef out the encrypted messages junk? I would have thought the configuration stuff could detect the absence of crypt() and built Elm accordingly. -- John R. MacMillan jrmacmillan@lily.waterloo.edu "I was _roasted_!!" ..!watmath!lily!jrmacmillan -- M&Ms Peanut
mike@ists (Mike Clarkson) (06/19/88)
In article <4887@watcgl.waterloo.edu>, jrmacmillan@lily.waterloo.edu (John R. MacMillan) writes: > In article <242@pvab.UUCP> robert@pvab.UUCP (Robert Claeson) writes: > |No big idea, unless you've got UNIX sources. Elm 2.0 requires the crypt() > |function, which is *not* distributed outside of the U.S. > > Requires it?? Is this a deeply ingrained dependency or can I just > #ifdef out the encrypted messages junk? > > I would have thought the configuration stuff could detect the absence > of crypt() and built Elm accordingly. Only the DES versions of crypt are (perhaps) embargoed. All machines have some encryption (for /etc/passwd at least). If not, the PD crypt's are available in comp.sources. I don't think we need to make it so that encrypted mail is uncrackable, just unreadable. Or as you suggest, just ifdef it. -- Mike Clarkson mike@ists.UUCP Institute for Space and Terrestrial Science mike@ists.yorku.ca York University, North York, Ontario, uunet!mnetor!yunexus!ists!mike CANADA M3J 1P3 +1 (416) 736-5611