xg00@bunny.UUCP (Xev Gittler) (11/22/88)
Considering the length of time that it is taking for 2.1 to be placed in comp.sources.unix, would it really be so bad for the person in charge to post 2.1 (or .2, .3, .4, or whatever it's up to) to this group? I think that would make a lot of sense. -- Xev Gittler xg00@gte.com, or xg00%gte.com@relay.cs.net
jos@idca.tds.PHILIPS.nl (Jos Vos) (11/24/88)
In article <6286@bunny.UUCP> xg00@bunny.UUCP (Xev Gittler) writes: >Considering the length of time that it is taking for 2.1 to be placed >in comp.sources.unix, would it really be so bad for the person in >charge to post 2.1 (or .2, .3, .4, or whatever it's up to) to this >group? I think that would make a lot of sense. A few weeks ago I reposted Elm 2.1 (including official patch #1) in Europe in eunet.sources. So European netlanders should have it already. Maybe a possible repost in comp.mail.elm could have a limited distribution (U.S. only? - :-) I know the world is greater than Europe and the U.S...) -- -- ###### Jos Vos ###### Internet jos@idca.tds.philips.nl ###### -- ###### ###### UUCP ...!mcvax!philapd!jos ######