[comp.mail.elm] Now that someone is talking about Filter ...

plocher%sally@Sun.COM (John Plocher) (05/09/89)

Elm's Filter program can be used to forward messages.  When used in such a
way, filter transforms the following header:

	From sun!uwvax!puff.cs.wisc.edu!jeff
	Date: some date
	From: jeff@puff.cs.wisc.edu (Jeff Public)
	Subject: something
	To: plocher@sun.com

into
	Subject: "something"
	From: Filter of plocher@sun.com <plocher@sun.com>
	To: newperson@newmachine
	X-Filtered-by: Filter version xxx

As I read RFC822 it *should* be doing this instead:
	
	Date: some date
	Resent-Date: date forwarded
	From: jeff@puff.cs.wisc.edu (Jeff Public)
	Resent-From: plocher@sun.com
	Resent-Sender: Filter program used by John Plocher <plocher@sun.com>
	Subject: something
	To: plocher@sun.com
	Resent-To: newperson@newmachine
	X-Filtered-by: Filter version xxx


The questions:
	Do I understand things OK?

	Is the current Filter behavior correct?

	What will break if I try to recode filter to use the Resent- fields
	as shown in the last example? 

	What is the answer to life, the universe, and everything?

-John

ps.  Don't bother answering the last one - I know what the answer to *that* one
because of my neat digital watch :-)

andre@targon.UUCP (andre) (05/09/89)

In article <103736@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> plocher@Sun.Com (John Plocher) writes:
>	What is the answer to life, the universe, and everything?

42 of course (as all reasonable persons should know :-)

-- 
~----~ |m    AAA         DDDD  It's not the kill, but the thrill of the chase.
~|d1|~@--   AA AAvv   vvDD  DD        Segment registers are for worms.
~----~  &  AAAAAAAvv vvDD  DD
~~~~~~ -- AAA   AAAvvvDDDDDD        Andre van Dalen, uunet!mcvax!targon!andre

jbayer@ispi.UUCP (Jonathan Bayer) (05/10/89)

In article <543@targon.UUCP> andre@targon.UUCP (andre) writes:
>In article <103736@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> plocher@Sun.Com (John Plocher) writes:
>>	What is the answer to life, the universe, and everything?
>
>42 of course (as all reasonable persons should know :-)

But only in base 13  :-)


JB
-- 
Jonathan Bayer			      Beware: The light at the end of the
Intelligent Software Products, Inc.	      tunnel may be an oncoming dragon
500 Oakwood Ave.				...uunet!ispi!root
Roselle Park, NJ   07204    (201) 245-5922    jbayer@ispi.UUCP

mike@pcsbst.UUCP (Mike Schroeder) (05/10/89)

In article <543@targon.UUCP> andre@targon.UUCP (andre) writes:
>In article <103736@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> plocher@Sun.Com (John Plocher) writes:
>>	What is the answer to life, the universe, and everything?
>
>42 of course (as all reasonable persons should know :-)

you are right (----------------"---------------------;-)

but then, you should have read the next couple of lines!

you should not even have answered, as (I quote): "all reasonable
persons should know" ;-)

Anyway, all I see is 'yellow'
---
Mike Schroeder		PCS-Mail: msc
SNAIL: PCS GmbH; Pfaelzer-Wald-Str. 36; D-8000 Muenchen 90; W. Germany
UUCP:  msc@pcsbst.UUCP   or  ...uunet!unido!pcsbst!cochise!mike
                         or  ...pyramid!pcsbst!cochise!mike
VOICE: xx49-89-68004208

plocher%sally@Sun.COM (John Plocher) (05/11/89)

In article Someone writes
>In article Someone writes
>>In article <103736@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> plocher@Sun.Com (John Plocher) writes:
>>>	What is the answer to life, the universe, and everything?
>>42 of course (as all reasonable persons should know :-)
>But only in base 13  :-)

Sigh,

I should have known better.  I have gotten over a dozen replies (mail and
usenet) to my message.  One suggested I join the elm development group
(I did), another suggested using "deliver" since filter didn't do the right
thing (I know that, but thanks for the pointer to "deliver")...

Flame on

BUT ***ALL*** the rest were stupid followups pertaining to the Hitchiker
quote that I specifically said I didn't want answers to!

Flame off

Does ANYONE out here have anything useful to say about the use and misuse
of Reply-xxx: headers?  If you do, please reply.

   -John Plocher