bronson@mfci.UUCP (Tan Bronson) (06/06/89)
I've been using elm2.2 on the Multiflow Trace (4.3BSD) for a few weeks now,
so I thought I'd convert my home system also, but I'm having a
few problems:
1) when I send mail there is blank line between the smail headers
and the elm headers:
From bronson!tan Tue Jun 6 09:22:31 1989
Return-Path: <bronson!tan>
Received: by m6.multiflow.com; Tue, 6 Jun 89 09:22:29 EDT
Received: by m3.multiflow.com; Tue, 6 Jun 89 09:22:24 EDT
Received: by Microvation.com (smail2.5)
id AA03941; 6 Jun 89 08:40:34 EDT (Tue)
To: bronson@mfci
Date: Tue Jun 6 08:40:34 1989
Message-Id: <8906060840.AA03941@Microvation.com>
From: tan@Microvation.com (Tan Bronson)
Status: OR
Subject: Forwarded mail...
To: bronson@mfci
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 89 8:40:33 EDT
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.2 PL2]
Is this correct or an interaction between elm/smail2.5?
2) Should I tell elm about the pathalias data files used by smail,
or should I let smail do all the work? It seems unnecessary for
elm to do work, smail is already doing.
3) Should I tell elm about the Microvation.COM domain, or should I
let smail do all the work? Does anyone out there use the same
combination as I do and have it working correctly?
Tan Bronson
Multiflow Computer Inc UUCP(work): {yale,uunet}!mfci!bronson
175 N Main St UUCP(home): {yale,mfci}!bronson!tan
Branford, Ct 06405 Phone(work):(203)-488-6090