[comp.mail.elm] Changes in Monthly Elm Posting

syd@dsinc.DSI.COM (Syd Weinstein) (08/03/90)

Context difs of the changes in the Elm monthly posting.
*** o.elm.monthly
--- elm.monthly
**************
*** 1,4
! Expires: 5 Aug 90 00:00:00 GMT
  
  This is the monthly Elm Posting from the Elm Development Group and
  your Elm Coordinator.  This posting generated:
--- 1,4 -----
! Expires: 12 Sep 90 00:00:00 GMT
  
  This is the monthly Elm Posting from the Elm Development Group and
  your Elm Coordinator.  Please send all questions and comments about
**************
*** 1,8
  Expires: 5 Aug 90 00:00:00 GMT
  
  This is the monthly Elm Posting from the Elm Development Group and
! your Elm Coordinator.  This posting generated:
! Fri Jun 22 17:04:12 EDT 1990
  
  Current release version: Elm 2.3 PL3
  	This version was released at patch level 0.
--- 1,10 -----
  Expires: 12 Sep 90 00:00:00 GMT
  
  This is the monthly Elm Posting from the Elm Development Group and
! your Elm Coordinator.  Please send all questions and comments about
! this posting or Elm itself to elm@dsi.com (dsinc!elm).  This posting
! generated:
! Thu Aug  2 12:52:24 EDT 1990
  
  Current release version: Elm 2.3 PL5
  	This version was released at patch level 0.
**************
*** 4,10
  your Elm Coordinator.  This posting generated:
  Fri Jun 22 17:04:12 EDT 1990
  
! Current release version: Elm 2.3 PL3
  	This version was released at patch level 0.
  	comp.sources.unix Posting-number: Volume 22, Issues 60-85
  	Archive-name: elm2.3/part01 thru elm2.3/part26
--- 6,12 -----
  generated:
  Thu Aug  2 12:52:24 EDT 1990
  
! Current release version: Elm 2.3 PL5
  	This version was released at patch level 0.
  	comp.sources.unix Posting-number: Volume 22, Issues 60-85
  	Archive-name: elm2.3/part01 thru elm2.3/part26
**************
*** 10,17
  	Archive-name: elm2.3/part01 thru elm2.3/part26
  	Patches are posted to comp.sources.bugs and comp.mail.elm
  	After they are stable, patches are sent to comp.sources.unix
! 		Patches 1 through 3 have been sent to comp.sources.unix.
! 		No patches have yet been posted to comp.sources.unix.
  	Patches are available from the archive server at DSI.COM:
  	send mail to archive-server@DSI.COM
  	send elm index
--- 12,19 -----
  	Archive-name: elm2.3/part01 thru elm2.3/part26
  	Patches are posted to comp.sources.bugs and comp.mail.elm
  	After they are stable, patches are sent to comp.sources.unix
! 		Patches 1 through 5 have been sent to comp.sources.unix.
! 		No patches have yet appeared in comp.sources.unix.
  	Patches are available from the archive server at DSI.COM:
  	send mail to archive-server@DSI.COM
  	send elm index
**************
*** 21,28
  information from the archive server.
  
  Planed next version: Elm 2.4
! 	Current Elm 2.4 status: Not even started
! 	Expected release date: 5/1/91
  
  As of release 2.1, Elm is now being developed by a cooperative venture
  of volunteers loosely being called the Elm Development Group.  There are
--- 23,30 -----
  information from the archive server.
  
  Planed next version: Elm 2.4
! 	Current Elm 2.4 status: In development
! 	Expected release date: not before 5/1/91
  
  As of release 2.1, Elm is now being developed by a cooperative venture
  of volunteers loosely being called the Elm Development Group.  There are
**************
*** 47,53
  mail me asking for me to send you patches, I won't.  Use the archive
  server.  The archive-server will not respond to users named root,
  daemon, or postmaster to prevent loops.  Please do not use those names
! for archive requests.  Also do not send archive requests to elm@dsi.com.
  
  The following sites have agreed to make Elm available via anonymous ftp.
  
--- 49,55 -----
  mail me asking for me to send you patches, I won't.  Use the archive
  server.  The archive-server will not respond to users named root,
  daemon, or postmaster to prevent loops.  Please do not use those names
! for archive requests.  PLEASE do not send archive requests to elm@dsi.com.
  
  The following sites have agreed to make Elm available via anonymous ftp.
  
**************
*** 72,78
  at the same time we are working on the next release.  Also starting with
  release 2.2 a list of known problems will be published in this posting.
  
! Known bugs in Elm 2.3 PL0:
  	The following are from the Elm 2.4 "To.Do" list that are
  considered bugs, not enhancements, that have not yet been done.  Items
  which are enhancements are not listed here.  It is our intention to
--- 74,80 -----
  at the same time we are working on the next release.  Also starting with
  release 2.2 a list of known problems will be published in this posting.
  
! Known bugs in Elm 2.3 PL5:
  	The following are from the Elm 2.4 "To.Do" list that are
  considered bugs, not enhancements, that have not yet been done.  Items
  which are enhancements are not listed here.  It is our intention to
**************
*** 115,121
  GB04 The preprocessor testing in Configure does	not work with gcc
       as	the compiler.
  
! GB09 [next item	goes here]
  
  2.  Elm(1) bugs
  
--- 117,125 -----
  GB04 The preprocessor testing in Configure does	not work with gcc
       as	the compiler.
  
! GB09 All addresses need	to support both	an escape character and
!      quoting the name portion to allow for illegal chars and
!      blanks.
  
  GB10 [next item	goes here]
  
**************
*** 117,123
  
  GB09 [next item	goes here]
  
! 2.  Elm(1) bugs
  
  EB02 Encryption	is not fully implemented in ELM.  In elm(1) we
       have the following	problems:
--- 121,127 -----
       quoting the name portion to allow for illegal chars and
       blanks.
  
! GB10 [next item	goes here]
  
  2.  Elm(1) bugs
  
**************
*** 119,124
  
  2.  Elm(1) bugs
  
  EB02 Encryption	is not fully implemented in ELM.  In elm(1) we
       have the following	problems:
  
--- 123,130 -----
  
  GB10 [next item	goes here]
  
+ 2.  Elm(1) bugs
+ 
  EB02 Encryption	is not fully implemented in ELM.  In elm(1) we
       have the following	problems:
  
**************
*** 183,189
  
  EB23 Complaint (probably occurs	under certain configurations
       only) that	address	optimization occurs regardless of whether
!      its configured.
  
  EB24 Complaint (probably occurs	under certain configurations
       only) that	address	optimization "over optimizes" -	the last
--- 189,196 -----
  
  EB23 Complaint (probably occurs	under certain configurations
       only) that	address	optimization occurs regardless of whether
!      its configured.  [unable to check out anymore under Elm 2.3,
!      will be dropped from the list]
  
  EB24 Complaint (probably occurs	under certain configurations
       only) that	address	optimization "over optimizes" -	the last
**************
*** 188,193
  EB24 Complaint (probably occurs	under certain configurations
       only) that	address	optimization "over optimizes" -	the last
       node in the address is claimed to be known	when it	isn't.
  
  EB25 If	elm is replying	to a message and considers From: lines
       valid and resolves	pathaliases, if	the reply path from the
--- 195,202 -----
  EB24 Complaint (probably occurs	under certain configurations
       only) that	address	optimization "over optimizes" -	the last
       node in the address is claimed to be known	when it	isn't.
+      [unable to	check out anymore under	Elm 2.3, will be dropped
+      from the list]
  
  EB25 If	elm is replying	to a message and considers From: lines
       valid and resolves	pathaliases, if	the reply path from the
**************
*** 216,222
       full name information, it sometimes places	the user name in
       ()s as the	comment	in addition to the full	name.
  
! EB40 [next item	goes here]
  
  3.  Utilities bugs
  
--- 225,233 -----
       full name information, it sometimes places	the user name in
       ()s as the	comment	in addition to the full	name.
  
! EB40 If	reading	an alternate folder and	all messages are marked
!      for deletion and a	resync is performed, the folder	is delet-
!      ed	and Elm	exits saying it	cannot open the	folder.
  
  EB41 [next item	goes here]
  
**************
*** 218,224
  
  EB40 [next item	goes here]
  
! 3.  Utilities bugs
  
  UB02 Newmail(1)	displays a null	"From" when a message does not
       contain a From: header line.  It needs to be able to parse
--- 229,235 -----
       for deletion and a	resync is performed, the folder	is delet-
       ed	and Elm	exits saying it	cannot open the	folder.
  
! EB41 [next item	goes here]
  
  3.  Utilities bugs
  
**************
*** 220,225
  
  3.  Utilities bugs
  
  UB02 Newmail(1)	displays a null	"From" when a message does not
       contain a From: header line.  It needs to be able to parse
       the return	path and display the "last two words" of it, just
--- 231,238 -----
  
  EB41 [next item	goes here]
  
+ 3.  Utilities bugs
+ 
  UB02 Newmail(1)	displays a null	"From" when a message does not
       contain a From: header line.  It needs to be able to parse
       the return	path and display the "last two words" of it, just
**************
*** 242,248
       fore doesn't list all the "To" header, for	example, if
       presented on more than one	line.
  
! UB12 [next item	goes here]
  
  
  New Features/Changes in 2.3:
--- 255,267 -----
       fore doesn't list all the "To" header, for	example, if
       presented on more than one	line.
  
! UB12 X.400 now also uses the = in its addresses, newalias was
!      changed from :  to	= due to X.400,	but now	even = is not
!      good for a	delimiter.  Newalias needs to have an escape
!      mechanism for its addresses.  This	needs to be coordinated
!      with GBxx.
! 
! UB13 [next item	goes here]
  
  
  New Features/Changes in 2.3:
-- 
=====================================================================
Sydney S. Weinstein, CDP, CCP                   Elm Coordinator
Datacomp Systems, Inc.                          Voice: (215) 947-9900
syd@DSI.COM or dsinc!syd                        FAX:   (215) 938-0235