yan@integ.ec.bull.fr (12/12/90)
A few time ago, I sent a mail to Syd Weinstein, to ask for a second elm session. Our discussion is attached hereafter. Today, I post it because it suddenly appeared to me that other people could be interested, and I would like to enlarge the debate. Sorry if this kind of question has already been asked, but 'till today, I didn't read this newsgroup; from now on, I will. ::::::::::::::::::::: >Syd Weinstein >> >>Quoting yan@integ.ec.bull.fr, >>> Could it be possible, in a further version of elm, to open a second session, >>> only for reading ? >>> I feel uncomfortable when, for one reason or another, I want to view something >>> in a folder while editing a mail, for example. >>It is already possible to open up a second elm session on a different >>file, are you asking for a second elm session on the same file the first >>is using? IE a read only session would not care about locks? >> >>-- > >Yes, that's exactly what I mean: a read only session that would not care about >locks. >Thanks for answering. ::::::::::::::::::::: -- =========================================================================== Yves A. Nicollet Email: yan@integ.ec.bull.fr \ / /\ |\ | Bull SA Unix Center or: Yves.Nicollet@ec.bull.fr \/ /__\ | \ | Echirolles - France Phone: +33 76 39 77 85 ___/ / \| \| ===========================================================================