pozar@kumr.lns.com (Tim Pozar) (03/17/91)
Volume 8, Number 10 11 March 1991
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| _ |
| / \ |
| /|oo \ |
| - FidoNews - (_| /_) |
| _`@/_ \ _ |
| FidoNet (r) | | \ \\ |
| International BBS Network | (*) | \ )) |
| Newsletter ______ |__U__| / \// |
| / FIDO \ _//|| _\ / |
| (________) (_/(_|(____/ |
| (jm) |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Editor in Chief: Vince Perriello
Editors Emeritii: Thom Henderson, Dale Lovell
Chief Procrastinator Emeritus: Tom Jennings
Copyright 1991, Fido Software. All rights reserved. Duplication
and/or distribution permitted for noncommercial purposes only.
For use in other circumstances, please contact Fido Software.
FidoNews is published weekly by and for the Members of the
FidoNet (r) International Amateur Electronic Mail System. It is
a compilation of individual articles contributed by their authors
or authorized agents of the authors. The contribution of articles
to this compilation does not diminish the rights of the authors.
You are encouraged to submit articles for publication in
FidoNews. Article submission standards are contained in the file
ARTSPEC.DOC, available from node 1:1/1. 1:1/1 is a Continuous
Mail system, available for network mail 24 hours a day.
Fido and FidoNet are registered trademarks of Tom Jennings of
Fido Software, Box 77731, San Francisco CA 94107, USA and are
used with permission.
Opinions expressed in FidoNews articles are those of the authors
and are not necessarily those of the Editor or of Fido Software.
Most articles are unsolicited. Our policy is to publish every
responsible submission received.
Table of Contents
1. ARTICLES ................................................. 1
Vote: Proposed New FidoNet Policy ........................ 1
Collector's Corner Echo! ................................. 14
Apple Software for Fidonet Compatibility ................. 16
Z1EC Election Runoff - One Opinion ....................... 17
WorldPol, About to Become Policy5 ........................ 19
2. COLUMNS .................................................. 21
Getting it there, YAPPPIV ................................ 21
3. LATEST VERSIONS .......................................... 24
Latest Software Versions ................................. 24
4. NOTICES .................................................. 29
And more!
FidoNews 8-10 Page 1 11 Mar 1991
=================================================================
ARTICLES
=================================================================
Vote: Proposed New FidoNet Policy
---------------------------------
Matt Whelan, 3:3/1000 (3:712/627)
International Coordinator
In accordance with current FidoNet<tm> policy, version 4.07, a
majority of the RCs have requested a vote on a proposed new
policy, generally known as WorldPol.
Please read WorldPol (see below) carefully. Note that the version
to be voted on is v1H, which has NOT previously been published.
The vote will be conducted in accordance with Sections 8.1-8.6
of current policy. I would like to draw everyone's attention to
section 8.3 in particular:
8.3 Eligibility to Vote
Each member of the FidoNet coordinator structure at and
above Network Coordinator is entitled to one vote. (Hub
coordinators do not vote.) In the case of the position
changing hands during the balloting process, either the
incumbent or the new coordinator may vote, but not both.
If a person holds more than one coordinator position,
they still receive only one vote.
Network coordinators are expected to assess the opinions
of the members of their network, and to vote accordingly.
A formal election is not necessary, but the network
coordinator must inform the net of the issues and solicit
input. The network coordinator functions as the
representative of the rank and file members of FidoNet.
As this is not a 'personality' vote, I see no need for secret
balloting. This will, hopefully, encourage all eligible voters
to present a truly representative view of net-wide opinion.
The schedule for voting is as follows:
- March 15 - April 11: discussion period
- April 12 - April 25: voting period
- April 26 - April 30: Regional vote totals (*) to be
published in appropriate local/
regional Sysop conferences
FidoNews 8-10 Page 2 11 Mar 1991
- May 1: deadline for advising RC of local
problems/protests, or ZC of RC's failure to
publish/include valid votes.
- May 2: deadline for Regional totals to be sent to the ZC,
zone tabulating (*)
- May 9: deadline for Zone totals to be sent to the IC
Zone totals to be published in appropriate
local/regional/zone sysop conferences.
- May 15: deadline for advising ZC/IC of problems/protests
- May 16: deadline for IC to report final results to the ZCs
- May 20: complete results are published in the Nodediff
and FidoNews
(*) All nets will be shown in the Regional report, and all nets
and regions will be shown in the Zone report. Any that do not
vote will be listed as such. The total numbers MUST give the
total number of regions and nets in each zone. For example:
Zone 999, Solar System
ZC YES
RC 01 NO
Net 123 YES
Net 234 NO
Net 345 YES
Net 456 NO
Net 567 YES
Net 678 NO
RC 02 YES
Net 789 NO
Net etc.
No vote cast:
RC 99
Net 890
Net 901
Net etc.
=================================================================
Proposed Policy:
=================================================================
FidoNews 8-10 Page 3 11 Mar 1991
FidoNet Worldwide Policy Document Version 1h
December 9th, 1990
This Worldwide Policy document has been released for vote by
the Coordinator structure and is not yet in force.
1 FidoNet
This document installs an international (inter-zonal) policy
for sysops who are members of the FidoNet organization of
bulletin board systems worldwide. FidoNet is defined by a list
of nodes (NodeList) issued on a weekly basis by each of the Zone
Coordinators, on behalf of the International Coordinator.
A node is understood to be a "member system" of FidoNet. The
collection of nodes is classified into Zones, Regions and
Networks.
Each FidoNet Zone is entitled to issue its own policy
document, according to its own needs and customs. This
International Policy, determines general rules which must be
specified -and may not be contradicted- by the Zone Policies.
Regions and local Networks may also issue their own policies,
provided such policies do not contradict this International
Policy or the respective Zone's policy.
1.1 Overview
FidoNet is an amateur electronic mail system.
As such, all of its participants and operators are unpaid
volunteers. From its nearly beginning in 1984, as a few friends
swapping messages back and forth mainly in North America, it
consists now of an International community of more than seven
thousand systems all over the world.
FidoNet is not a common carrier or a value-added service
network and is a public network only as much as the independent,
constituent nodes may individually provide public access to the
network on their system.
FidoNet exists to provide electronic mail services to its
member sysops. To efficiently provide such services, various
structure and control mechanisms are essential. The structure is
organized into multiple nets, with decentralized administration.
This document delineates all of the procedures at the
international level of FidoNet, as well as some general rules for
the lower levels (intra-zonal), developed to manage the network.
Authorities in the international level not defined by this
document, shall be defined by the Zone Coordinators Council and
the International Coordinator.
FidoNews 8-10 Page 4 11 Mar 1991
2 Language
Each zone has the right to determine its own official language.
At the international (inter-zonal) level, for practical
purposes, FidoNet adopts English as its official language. All
the FidoNet documents issued at the international level must
exist in English. Translation into other languages is encouraged.
3 Access to FidoNet
FidoNet membership is open to everybody that fulfills the
technical standards described in paragraph 5.9. Lower-level
policies may issue additional restrictions only if particularly
authorized by the Zone Coordinator Council.
4 Organization
The organizational structure of FidoNet, has been developed to
distribute the administration and control of FidoNet, to the
lowest possible level, while still allowing for coordinated
action over the entire system.
Effective administration is made viable by operating in a
top-down manner.
This means, that a person at any given level is responsible to
the level above, and responsible for administrating the level
below.
If a person at any level above sysop is unable to properly
perform their duties, the person at the next level may replace
them. For example, if a Region Coordinator fails to perform, the
Zone Coordinator may cause the Coordinator to be replaced.
Coordinators may also be removed by a majority vote of the level
below. For example, if network Coordinators in a region lose
faith in the ability of a Region Coordinator to effectively
perform, they may vote to have a new Coordinator elected.
4.1 International Coordinator
The International Coordinator (IC) is the Executive Officer of
FidoNet and coordinates the joint production of the master
nodelist by the Zone Coordinators. The International Coordinator
is responsible for creating new zones in FidoNet, but can only do
so with the approval of the Zone Coordinator Council.
The International Coordinator is selected by unanimous vote of
the Zone Coordinators, and removed by a majority vote of the Zone
Coordinators.
FidoNews 8-10 Page 5 11 Mar 1991
4.2 Zone Coordinator Council
The Zone Coordinator Council (ZCC) consists of the Zone
Coordinators -each having a single ballot- and the International
Coordinator. In the event of a ZCC vote tie, the International
Coordinator may cast an additional vote to untie the election.
The Zone Coordinator Council is the legislative body of
FidoNet, it represents each of the zones in FidoNet. It is the
highest authority of the network's Top-Down organization.
4.3 Zones and Zone Coordinators
A zone is a geographic area containing one or many regions,
covering one or more countries.
The Zone Coordinator is the Executive Officer of the Zone, and
the zone's representative to the other zones.
The Zone Coordinator compiles the nodelists from all of the
regions in the zone, creates a master nodelist and a difference
file, which is then distributed over FidoNet within the zone. A
Zone Coordinator does not perform message-forwarding services for
any nodes in the zone, whereas the Zone Coordinator is
responsible for the formation and/or administration of one or
more zone-gates to provide interzone mail facilities.
The method used for selection of Zone coordinators is left to
the discretion of the relevant Zone Policy. In the absence of a
Zone Policy selection method, Zone Coordinators are elected and
removed by a majority vote of the Region Coordinators in the
Zone.
4.4 Regions and Region Coordinators
A Region is a well-defined geographic area containing nodes
which may or may not be combined into networks. A typical Region
will contain many nodes in networks, and a few independent nodes
which are not part of the network.
The Region Coordinator maintains the list of independent nodes
in the region, and accepts nodelists from the Network
Coordinators in the Region.
These are compiled to create a regional nodelist, which is sent
to the Zone Coordinator. A Region Coordinator is encouraged to
perform message-forwarding services for nodes within the region,
but is not forced to, unless the appropriate Zone or Region
policy imposes such a requirement.
FidoNews 8-10 Page 6 11 Mar 1991
The method used for selection of Regional coordinators is left
to the discretion of the relevant Zone or Region Policy. In the
absence of such a policy selection method, Region Coordinators
are elected and removed by a majority vote of the NCs in the
Region.
4.5 Networks and Network Coordinators
A network is a group of nodes, normally but not exclusively in
a local geographic area. Networks coordinate their mail activity
to decrease cost.
The Network Coordinator is responsible for maintaining the list
of nodes for the network, and for forwarding netmail sent to
members of the network from other FidoNet nodes. The Network
Coordinator may make arrangements to handle outgoing netmail, but
is not required to do so, unless the appropriate Zone, Region or
Net policy imposes such a requirement.
The method used for selection of Network coordinators is left
to the discretion of the relevant Zone/Region/Net Policy. In the
absence of such a policy selection method, Network Coordinators
are elected and removed by a majority vote of the Nodes in the
Network.
4.5.1 Network Routing Hubs
Network Routing Hubs exist only in some networks. They may be
appointed by the Network Coordinator, in order to assist the
management (especially routing tasks) of the network.
4.6 Individual systems (Nodes)
The smallest subdivision of FidoNet is the individual system,
corresponding to a single entry in the nodelist. The system
operator (SysOp) formulates a policy for running the board and
dealing with the users. The sysop must mesh with the rest of the
FidoNet system to receive and send mail, and the local policy
must be consistent with other levels of FidoNet.
4.6.1 Users of an individual system
The sysop is responsible for the actions of any user when they
affect the rest of FidoNet (i.e. if the user is annoying, the
sysop is annoying). The users have no rights under this policy
document.
FidoNews 8-10 Page 7 11 Mar 1991
4.6.2 Points
A point is a system that is not in the nodelist, but
communicates with FidoNet through a node defined to as bossnode.
A point is generally regarded in the same manner as a user and,
for example, the bossnode is responsible for mail from the
point. Points are addressed using the bossnode's nodelist
address; for example, a point system with a bossnode of
1:125/111 might be known as 1:125/111.6. Mail sent to the point
will be sent to the bossnode, which then routes it to the point.
Point operators are not FidoNet members, they are only users of
a FidoNet node, as any other regular user; they have no rights
under this policy document.
4.7 The FidoNet Technical Standards Committee
The FidoNet Technical Standards Committee, abbreviated as the
FTSC, exists for the purpose of establishing minimum requirements
in software and hardware to be able to interface with FidoNet.
These minimum requirements must be obeyed at every level. Nodes
not meeting these requirements are ineligible for a node number
(see section 5.9). These requirements are subject to change at
any time by the FTSC.
5 General Procedures for All Coordinators
5.1 Making Available Difference Files and Nodelist
Each Coordinator is responsible for obtaining and making
available for file request, on a weekly basis, nodelist
difference files and complete nodelists.
5.2 Making Available FidoNews Documents
FidoNews is the Official Newsletter of FidoNet. Each
Coordinator is responsible for obtaining and making available
for file request on a weekly basis, FidoNews Documents.
This requirement may be waived in the event that a majority of
the Sysops served by the Coordinator have no desire to read or
receive FidoNews. Any Zone Coordinator may also waive this
requirement under special circumstances.
5.3 Processing Nodelist Changes and Passing Them Upstream
FidoNews 8-10 Page 8 11 Mar 1991
Each Coordinator is responsible for obtaining nodelist
information from the level below, processing it, and passing the
results to the level above.
The timing of this process is determined by the requirements
imposed by the level above.
5.4 Ensure the Latest Policy is Available
A Coordinator is responsible to make the current version of the
International Policy available to the level below, and to
encourage familiarity with it.
5.5 Minimize the Number of Hats Worn
Coordinators are encouraged to limit the number of
FidoNet-related Coordinator functions they perform. A Coordinator
who holds two different positions, compromises the appeal
process. For example, is the Network Coordinator is also the
Region Coordinator, sysops in that network are denied one level
of appeal.
Multiple hats are also discouraged due to the difficulty of
replacing services when a coordinator leaves the net.
5.6 Be a Member of the Area Administered
A Coordinator must be a member of the area administered. This
is, a Network Coordinator must be a member of the network he is
to coordinate.
A Region Coordinator must be either a member of a network in the
region, or an independent in a region.
5.7 Encourage New Sysops to Enter FidoNet
A Coordinator is encouraged to operate a public bulletin board
system which is freely available for the purpose of distributing
Policy and Nodelists to potential new sysops. Dissemination of
this information to persons who are potential FidoNet sysops is
important to the growth of FidoNet, and Coordinators should
encourage development of new systems.
5.8 Tradition, Precedent and Technical Management
A Coordinator is not bound by the practices of predecessor.
However, it must be clear that Coordinators are bound by all
requirements of this document, both as FidoNet sysops and as
Coordinators. The holding of a Coordinator title does not grant
license to annoy others or to flaunt policy.
FidoNews 8-10 Page 9 11 Mar 1991
The primary responsibility of any Coordinator is technical
management of network operations. Decisions MUST be made only
on technical grounds. A Coordinator has the responsibility to act
as objectively as possible; objectivity must be considered an
essential factor when making a decision.
5.9 Exclusivity of Zone Mail Hour
Zone Mail Hour is the heart of FidoNet, as this is when network
mail is passed between systems. Any system which wishes to be a
part of FidoNet must be able to receive mail during this time
using the protocol defined in the current FidoNet Technical
Standards Committee publication (FTS-0001 at this writing). It
is permissible to have greater capability (for example, to
support additional protocols or extended mail hours), but the
minimum requirement is FTS-0001 capability during this one hour
of the day.
This time is exclusively reserved for netmail. Many phone
systems charge on a per-call basis, regardless of whether a
connect, no connect, or busy signal is encountered. For this
reason, any activity other than normal network mail processing
that ties up a system during ZMH is considered annoying behavior.
User (BBS) access to a system is prohibited during ZMH.
Zone Mail Hour will be defined by each Zone Policy. In the
absence of a Zone Policy, it will be defined by the Zone
Coordinator.
6 Election and Referendum Procedures
Any election or referendum at any level of FidoNet, must be
democratic by western standards.
Each zone will issue its own election procedures, which must be
approved by the Zone Coordinator Council before implementation.
If a worldwide election, with the participation of all zones,
is to be held, the Zone Coordinator Council will determine the
election procedures.
7 Policy Referenda
7.1 International Policy
A referendum on International Policy modification is invoked by
the International Coordinator at the direction of a majority of
the Zone Coordinators, or a majority of the Region Coordinators
of all zones, a majority of the Network Coordinators of all
zones, or by one third of all the sysops in all zones.
FidoNews 8-10 Page 10 11 Mar 1991
All the members of FidoNet are entitled to vote on an
International Policy referendum, which is to be held according to
the procedures described by the Zone Coordinator Council before
the election is called.
7.2 Zone Policy
A referendum on Zone Policy modification is invoked by the Zone
Coordinator, by a majority vote of the Region Coordinators in the
zone, by a majority vote of the Network Coordinators in the
zone, or by one third of all the sysops in the zone.
All the members of the zone are entitled to vote on a Zone
Policy referendum, which is to be held according to the
procedures described on the Zone Policy. If such document does
not exist, the procedures will be determined by the Zone
Coordinator with the approval of the Zone Coordinator Council.
The formulation of Region and Network Policy documents is
encouraged, and must be regulated by the Zone Policy documents in
each zone.
7.3 Transition to a 'Worldwide Policy environment'
After the approval of this Worldwide Policy, the previously
existing policy will still be in effect for the Zone level until
the approval of a new Zone policy, according to the methods
provided in this document.
All the procedures introduced by this Worldwide Policy document
adjourn the procedures existing in the previous policy document.
8 Resolution of Disputes
The FidoNet judicial philosophy can be summed up in two rules:
1) Thou shalt not excessively annoy others.
2) Thou shalt not become excessively annoyed.
The parties involved in a dispute are encouraged to solve their
problems directly, without the intervention of a Coordinator.
8.1 Mediation Requests
Any of the parties involved may request the intervention of the
respective Coordinator: Network Coordinator if a dispute between
members of the same network, Region Coordinator if a dispute
between members of different networks on the same region; Zone
Coordinator if a dispute between members of different regions on
the same zone; International Coordinator if a dispute between
members of different zones.
FidoNews 8-10 Page 11 11 Mar 1991
The Coordinator requested as "mediator", will ask each party to
provide all the information before two weeks from the request and
will make a decision within forty-five days after he received all
the information from the involved parties.
A Coordinator, unable to resolve a dispute, may name a third
party to act as "mediator", provided the parties involved in the
dispute agree.
8.2 Appealing to a Mediator's Decision
A mediator's decision may be appealed to the immediately
superior level if considered unfair: Region Coordinators handle
appeals from decisions made by Network Coordinators; Zone
Coordinators handle appeals from decision made by Region
Coordinators; The International Coordinator handles appeals from
decisions made by the Zone Coordinators; and the Zone Coordinator
Council will handle appeals from decisions made by the
International Coordinator, being the Zone Coordinator Council's
resolutions, unappealable.
For appealing to a decision made by a third person named by a
Coordinator to act as mediator, it will be as if the Coordinator
made the resolution and the previously enumerated sequence of
appealing will be appropriate.
For appealing to a decision made by a mediator, the same terms
and procedures as for any Mediation Request apply.
8.3 Statute of Limitations
A mediation request may not be filed more than 60 days after
the date of discovery of the source of the infraction, either by
admission or technical discovery of the source of an infraction,
either by admission or technical evidence. Mediation requests may
not be filed more than 120 days after the incident, unless they
involve suspected unlawful behavior, in which the legal statute
of limitations of the country involved shall apply.
8.4 Echomail and File Distribution Networks
Each FidoNet Zone is encouraged to establish in it's Zone
Policy, the manner of handling Echomail and File Distribution,
and the resolution of disputes arising from both distributions.
No sysop may be required to carry an echomail conference or
a File Disribution a as a condition of joining or remaining in
FidoNet.
FidoNews 8-10 Page 12 11 Mar 1991
9 "CCC": Comments, Credits and Copyright!
This section will be automatically removed upon approval of this
document.
9.1 Comments on Implementation
This document is not final; FidoNet sysops are encouraged to
make suggestions for changes, as well as comments, which can be
addressed to FidoNet node 4:4/50 (WorldPol Project).
This World Policy will be adopted according to the mechanisms
provided on the present policy document.
9.2 Credits
Here I list the names of some individuals that had some direct
or indirect influence in the shaping of this text (in
alphabetical order):
- Raul Artaza (4:900/106)
- Bill Bolton (3:711/403)
- Steve Bonine (1:115/777)
- Randy Bush (1:105/6)
- Billy Coen (4:900/110)
- Jack Decker (1:154/8)
- Daniel Docekal (2:286/618)
- Tomas Gradin (2:200/108)
- Rob Hoare (3:712/630)
- Jesse David Hollington (1:225/1)
- Alejandro Hopkins (4:900/211)
- Tom Jennings (1:125/111)
- Glen Johnson (1:269/101)
- Daniel Kalchev (2:359/1)
- Raymond Lowe (3:700/725)
- Rick Moore (1:115/333)
- George Peace (1:270/101)
- Bob Satti (1:153/6)
- Jan Stozek (2:480/2)
- Erik Van Riper (1:260/230)
- Matt Whelan (3:712/627)
- Gustavo Zacarias (4:900/202)
Special thanks go to Ron Dwight (2:515/1), for his enthusiastic
cooperation.
9.3 Temporary Copyright
FidoNews 8-10 Page 13 11 Mar 1991
This document is Copyright (C) 1990 by Pablo Kleinman.
Todos los Derechos Reservados / All Rights Reserved.
This document is protected under international copyright laws.
Unauthorized use is subject to criminal prosecution.
Disclaimer: This document was written by a Spanish-speaking
individual, that uses English as a second language. If you find
any semantic, morphologic or syntactic errors, please forgive.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FidoNews 8-10 Page 14 11 Mar 1991
John Maly
FidoNet 1:141/745
-=( Collector's Corner Echo )=-
The Collector's Corner Echo is for those who collect things.
"Collect what?", you may ask. Well, anything, ranging from
coins to baseball cards to comic books to stamps to different
types of art. ANY type collectibles may be discussed.
If you are asking yourself "Where can I get more
information on it?", or are simply wondering what kind of person
talks to themself while they read FidoNews, then read on!
If you want more information, contact me at 1:141/745,
26:1203/1, 57:2300/101, or 99:9002/250. The echo currently
reaches the following known areas:
Connecticut:
--------------------------------------
Brookfield
Danbury
Meriden
New Fairfield
New Milford
Redding
Ridgefield
Southbury
Westport
Kansas:
--------------------------------------
Luther
Massachusetts:
--------------------------------------
Easthampton
West Newton
If you're interested in getting this echo, or just want
information, please let me know, or ask your local Collector's
Corner Echo carrier to add you to his AREAS.BBS.
Thanks for taking a few minutes of your life to read this,
and I hope you've found the echo you'll next add onto your BBS.
John Maly -=- TDS BBS
1:141/745
FidoNews 8-10 Page 15 11 Mar 1991
Node 1: 203-438-1955
Node 2: Coming Soon!
300-14.4k bps rates
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FidoNews 8-10 Page 16 11 Mar 1991
Dennis McClain-Furmanski
1:275/42
Apples Grab The Pup's Tail
Dennis McClain-Furmanski, APPLE Moderator
Back in the old days, when Visi-Calc was THE hot software
package, it seemed that the friendly fruit computers out of
Cupertino could do everything and then some. Unfortunately,
Fidonet compatibility was never something that was pulled off.
Until now.
Evan Molnar, sysop of Third Stone From The Sun, 1:269/318, has
completed both mailer and BBS software to hook Woz's Dream
Machine into our illustrious network.
The mailer software, called Fruity Dog, is a series of patches
plus external programs, that will modify the commercial BBS
package GBBS Pro (L&L Enterprises, Boulder, CO) so that it can
operate as a fully functional node. As an alternative to GBBS,
Evan has also written Death Disk BBS, using a compiler similar
to GBBS's ACOS, and includes the Fruity Dog software with it.
I realize that the vast majority of Apples still owned by those
on the net are probably relegated to keeping the kids off the
'big' machine, or languishing in the attic, under the box of
polyester pastels from the disco era. But there's still plenty
of life left in them. Hopefully, moreso now that they can serve
as a replacement for the machine you're using now, and would
rather use yourself.
Also, almost half of the 5.5 million Apple II machines sold
since 1978 are in schools, most of them still in service. I've
had a great number of inquiries from educators interested in
using the network to augment their own work, and the kids'
education. Now they can.
For more info, areafix APPLE and pop into the echo, or logon
269/318 (201) 652-7349, to see DDBBS and leave a note for the
sysop. Also, you can contact me at 275/42 (804) 424-1075, and
take a look at the GBBS/Fruity Dog software up and running.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FidoNews 8-10 Page 17 11 Mar 1991
Michele Hamilton
1:369/21
So, who's it gonna be?
I'm tired. It's 5 in the morning and I've been working on the
board all day. Reading mail, answering questions from users,
trying to find some way to make more room on my hard drive for
the files I've got, let alone the one's I'll be receiving
through the SDS and SDN, and it dawned on me that we still don't
have a ZEC here in Zone 1.
I decided to write this article in the hopes that maybe we can
get more than a handful to vote in the upcoming runoff election
and also, quite frankly, to plug my favorite candidate. Alot of
you know me. Some of you love me, some of you like me and, I'm
sure, there are some of you who hate me. I am not usually one who
speaks out for another, but I just _had_ to... this time.
(typical woman) <grin>
I can only speak from experience. I don't know TONY DAVIS but I
do know AMNON NISSAN, have been in his region for almost 3 years,
and have found him to be one helluva REC! He CARES!! Amnon has
helped me through some difficult times... with my machine, with
my configurations when I was NEC for my net and just about
anything else I loaded onto him. I have seen this man change...
from a hated dictator, which he appeared at the time because of
his ideas and the opposition to the way he was appointed REC, to
someone who knows how to listen to both sides and will.
When I first joined Fidonet there were many people in the region
screaming and yelling at him and his actions were, slightly
dictatorial. Since then he has grown. He has become someone who
cares more about the region, and Fidonet in general, than almost
any other person I know. He freely gives out his phone numbers
and I'm sure gets calls from all over the place from people with
questions about the stupidest of things. I've asked a few
"stupid" questions myself. Yet he has never shown anything but
patience and helpfulness. His manner has calmed down and his
approach has improved immensely. This tells me something. That he
is a person who can learn from his experiences and mistakes.
We in region 18 have been lucky to have someone like Amnon as our
REC. He has improved the flow of mail, decreased dupes and made
it a pleasureable experience for new and old sysops to get their
mail. Gone are the nightmares of the past. Replaced with reliable
service and understanding.
Amnon has been maligned by many but, I believe he is loved by
more. He can see both sides of the fence. Not that he sits on it.
But he has the capability and experience to view the whole
picture which encompasses the echos, including those who move
'em, those who moderate 'em and those who read 'em. His decisions
are rarely unjust or wrong but he can admit when he's made a
mistake and doesn't hesitate to correct it.
FidoNews 8-10 Page 18 11 Mar 1991
These are traits that we need in a Fidonet ZEC. We need someone
who can address ALL the different sections of echomail, from the
*EC who spends gobs of money moving the echos around, to the
moderator who has to handle the sometimes unruly echo participant
to the sysop who gets frustrated when mail doesn't get through.
The ability to balance the different aspects of echomail and
maintain your cool is a rare one. AMNON NISSAN has this ability.
I know, I know, I know. This sounds like a fan letter. Well,
maybe it is. I hope you will vote for Amnon in the upcoming
runoff and believe he's the best choice. But, for whatever it's
worth, this is more a THANK YOU to him, for the time, effort
and money he has put into making Region 18 a pleasure to be a
part of and for his dedication to improving the quality, not just
the quantity of Fidonet.
Whatever the outcome, we are sorry to see him go as our REC, but
we, or least I, am glad he was here. So, who's it gonna be? Well,
you've got my vote Amnon. :)
.\\ichele Hamilton
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FidoNews 8-10 Page 19 11 Mar 1991
Alejandro Hopkins
FidoNet 4:900/211.0
WORLDPOL, ABOUT TO BECOME POLICY5
Something great is about to happen. A new, truly democratic
Policy document will be voted, and will most probably become
Policy5. If you have been reading FidoNews lately, you must
already know about Worldpol, the Policy5 proposal that was
written by sysops all over the world. I have been in the
project since its very beginning, right after Policy 4 was
voted. Most sysops didn't like Policy4, and something had to be
done about it. So we started the Policy5_Project, and since
then, anybody who was interested in changing the current policy
document has been able to participate in the making of
Worldpol. Now the final version (1H) is ready for vote, and the
IC has called a referendum on it.
Unfortunately, the voting has to be done according to the
current policy, so grunt sysops won't have a vote on it, only
the coordinator structure will. But that, among lots of other
things, is taken care of in Worldpol. I'll name just a few of
the improvements of Worldpol over Policy4, although you must
already know about them:
- Nodes are not forced to be located in the geographic
area of the network they choose to belong to. So if
some crazy dude wants to call the other end of the
country to pick up his mail, he is free to do so.
- Coordinators are elected in a bottom-top manner. That
means that a NC is chosen by the mejority of the sysops
in the network, a RC is elected by the majority of the
NC's in the region, and so on. So if most sysops want
their NC replaced, they just choose another one,
doesen't matter if that NC is a good friend of the RC
or not.
- A referendum on International Policy modification is
invoked by the International Coordinator at the
direction of a majority of the Zone Coordinators, or a
majority of the Region Coordinators of all zones, a
majority of the Network Coordinators of all zones, or
by one third of all the sysops in all zones.
And all the members of FidoNet are entitled to vote on
it.
- Zone independency is considered all throughout the
the document, and the administration of the network
FidoNews 8-10 Page 20 11 Mar 1991
is much more decentralized.
So this is the oportunity to have the democratic policy
document we deserve. If you are a *C, vote for Worldpol. And
if you are a grunt sysop (just like me), let your NC know what
you think should be done, and ask him to represent you in his
vote.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FidoNews 8-10 Page 21 11 Mar 1991
=================================================================
COLUMNS
=================================================================
Bruce Gingery, Total System Software
FidoNet 1:310/5.1
YAPPPIV (Yet another packet proposal - part 4)
Over the last two weeks the message/packet status flags have
been presented, and the overall packet structure as a CASE
of packet-type. Now some explanation based on the illustra-
tions presented in those issues of FidoNews.
First, why TWO? The needs of packetted NetMail, and other
traffic with a single intended recipient differ somewhat from
the needs of group or conference mail. Ultimately, the `TO'
address of Echomail is meaningless, but how it got there and
who already has it becomes quite important.
To an actual mailer, however, where it is to send it IS quite
important in either case, thus the Interim address scheme, the
identical use in message or packet format, and the elimination
of the actual addresser and addressee and subject from the
header.
The reason for an "Interim Address" is simple. It is a handy
place to keep available WHERE the message will be sent by the
current system. Any message which does not HAVE an export
should always have a zero zone in the interim address. The
balance of the field is reusable for local message handling.
The interim address may be changed at each node which processes
a message or packet, and this is the norm.
Type-5 packets are ONLY created from messages with identical
path and seen-by information. When these are created the length
fields for the seen-by, path, and area name for all enclosed
messages are zeroed, and a single copy is maintained at the
packet level. In every case, the fields are null terminated or
omitted, and preceed the message or packet content, in the same
order as given in the header by their length fields. Lengths
INCLUDE any terminating null, thus a length of one may be taken
as an error or flag value.
Mail bundles, however, may consist of multiple packets in the
same "FILE". Each packet has a distinct header and all mail
which is destined to any given node is expected to be placed in a
single file. Any mix of type-4 and type-5 headers may be mixed
in a mail bundle, and each of those headers may service
compressed packeted mail, files, or individual messages. The
only bundling requirement is that the interim address be the
same for every packet or stand-alone message in the bundle.
FidoNews 8-10 Page 22 11 Mar 1991
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE ADDRESSEE? At long last, we come to the
addressee. There are CCITT standards (in the X.4xx X.5xx
range) for top-of-text identification of the sender and the
addressee. I strongly recommend that these be adopted and
specified for type-4 and type-5 packets. This should allow
for easier inter-networking, as well as the processing by BBSs
and other mail end use utilities. I would say that for FidoNet
usage, the CCITT Private and Public network identifier lines may
not be necessary while flow is uniquely through FidoNet, UNLESS
inter-network connection is specified at the origin. Software
should be able to generate these lines easily for inter-network
sharing of group/conference/echo mail.
Subject "linking", is only partially successful. The only known
relationship is when a message is actually replied to, and there
are many cases when people merely reply to a message to avoid
typing the addressee's name. The only linking pre-specified for
type-4 and type-5 messages is that of related, non-homogenous
`messages', where the first may contain a pure graphics letter-
head, the second, the actual plain text, a third, a digitized
signature, and the fourth perhaps an attached voice message,
graphics illustrations, or the like.
This column has been a preliminary presentation of a proposal
for TWO message header formats which address the growth of the
FidoNet network, keeping apace with technology, while doing the
utmost to not leave anyone in the dust. If anything beyond the
FTS-0001 type-2 standards are implemented, NodeList flagging
will be required.
The TYPE of compression used in logical successors to ARCmail
has not been addressed, but its presence allowed for. 4-d
addressing is mandated, though interfacing with 2-d only
software COULD default MyZone and Point zero, so long as
this is not a REPLY. Internally to mail-user interfacing,
related packers and tossers, and any packet converters,
the current ^a Kludge lines must be extracted. The tear
line with or without its software advertisement, and the
Origin line BBS advertisements may remain, but are NOT parsed
from messages bearing type-4 and type-5 headers. Rather, the
Origination address IS the point of origin within FidoNet.
CompressedContent "Messages" and "Packets" must be identified
within the first 16 bytes of the "text", as to what decompres-
sion utility is required for extraction. Unfortunately, at
least one current standard library & compression utility may
be excluded by this restriction, but leading ID's have become
a de-facto standard. This may merely be an indication that
the "text" is a stand-alone self-extractor, though this is NOT
recommended. Many nodes will merely purge any such self-
extracting "mail", as a matter of local policy.
FidoNews 8-10 Page 23 11 Mar 1991
Allowing more freedom with compressed mail shifts the burden to
the logistics side. Nodes merely passing-through mail which
which they are unable to process, MAY be passing the problem
along. This header proposal, however, does allow such passing
as well as the passing of encrypted or otherwise encoded mail.
Since there are international trade restrictions on some such
en/decrypt software, using these methods are not recommended,
but they ARE provided for.
It is quite concievable that the same mail `bundle' could at
the same time include:
1> Machine specific executable code, contained
within a libraried and compressed "Archive".
2> Voice mail.
3> A PostScript document, similarly compressed.
4> FTS-0001 compatible text mail, uncompressed.
5> FTS-0001 compatible text mail, compressed.
6> A digital ocilloscope recording.
7> NetMail which is following routing.
8> EchoMail which is passing along its normal
distribution route.
9> NetMail which is from the current to the target
system, with NO routing.
10> A set of spreadsheet (or similar) data.
11> One or more return receipts.
12> One or more return receipt requests.
13> An old EBCDIC MainFrame JCL script.
etc.
The only logical differentiation between a message and packet
using the type-4 and type-5 headers is the handling and the
content. A message may contain compressed data. A packet may
consist of a single message.
Comments and questions are welcome.
Bruce Gingery, Total System Software,
P.O. Box 923
Cheyenne, WY USA 82003-0923
FidoNet 1:310/5.1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FidoNews 8-10 Page 24 11 Mar 1991
=================================================================
LATEST VERSIONS
=================================================================
Latest Software Versions
MS-DOS Systems
--------------
Bulletin Board Software
Name Version Name Version Name Version
DMG 2.93 Phoenix 1.3 TAG 2.5g
Fido 12s+ QuickBBS 2.66 TBBS 2.1
GSBBS 3.02 RBBS 17.3B TComm/TCommNet 3.4
Lynx 1.30 RBBSmail 17.3B Telegard 2.5
Kitten 2.16 RemoteAccess 0.04a TPBoard 6.1
Maximus 1.02 SLBBS 1.77A Wildcat! 2.55
Opus 1.14+ Socrates 1.10 WWIV 4.12
PCBoard 14.5 XBBS 1.15
Network Node List Other
Mailers Version Utilities Version Utilities Version
BinkleyTerm 2.40 EditNL 4.00 ARC 7.0
D'Bridge 1.30 MakeNL 2.31 ARCAsim 2.30
Dutchie 2.90C ParseList 1.30 ARCmail 2.07
FrontDoor 1.99c Prune 1.40 ConfMail 4.00
PRENM 1.47 SysNL 3.14 Crossnet v1.5
SEAdog 4.51b XlatList 2.90 DOMAIN 1.42
TIMS 1.0(Mod8) XlaxDiff 2.35 EMM 2.02
XlaxNode 2.35 4Dog/4DMatrix 1.18
Gmail 2.05
GROUP 2.16
GUS 1.30
HeadEdit 1.15
InterPCB 1.31
LHARC 1.13
MSG 4.1
MSGED 2.06
MSGTOSS 1.3
Oliver 1.0a
PK[UN]ZIP 1.10
QM 1.0
QSORT 4.03
Sirius 1.0x
SLMAIL 1.36
StarLink 1.01
TagMail 2.41
TCOMMail 2.2
Telemail 1.27
FidoNews 8-10 Page 25 11 Mar 1991
TMail 1.15
TPBNetEd 3.2
TosScan 1.00
UFGATE 1.03
XRS 4.10*
XST 2.2
ZmailH 1.14
OS/2 Systems
------------
Bulletin Board Software Network Mailers Other Utilities
Name Version Name Version Name Version
Maximus-CBCS 1.02 BinkleyTerm 2.40 Parselst 1.32
ConfMail 4.00
EchoStat 6.0
oMMM 1.52
Omail 3.1
MsgEd 2.06
MsgLink 1.0C
MsgNum 4.14
LH2 0.50
PK[UN]ZIP 1.02
ARC2 6.00
PolyXARC 2.00
Qsort 2.1
Raid 1.0
Remapper 1.2
Tick 2.0
VPurge 2.07
Xenix/Unix
----------
BBS Software Mailers Other Utilities
Name Version Name Version Name Version
BinkleyTerm 2.30b Unzip 3.10
ARC 5.21
ParseLst 1.30b
ConfMail 3.31b
Ommm 1.40b
Msged 1.99b
Zoo 2.01
C-Lharc 1.00
Omail 1.00b
FidoNews 8-10 Page 26 11 Mar 1991
Apple II
----------
Bulletin Board Software Network Mailers Other Utilities
Name Version Name Version Name Version
GBBS Pro 2.1 Fruity Dog 1.0 ShrinkIt 3.2
DDBBS + 4.0 ShrinkIt GS 1.04
deARC2e 2.1
ProSel 8.65
Apple CP/M
----------
Bulletin Board Software Network Mailers Other Utilities
Name Version Name Version Name Version
Daisy v2j Daisy Mailer 0.38 Nodecomp 0.37
MsgUtil 2.5
PackUser v4
Filer v2-D
UNARC.COM 1.20
Macintosh
---------
Bulletin Board Software Network Mailers Other Utilities
Name Version Name Version Name Version
Red Ryder Host 2.1 Tabby 2.2 MacArc 0.04
Mansion 7.15 Copernicus 1.0 ArcMac 1.3
WWIV (Mac) 3.0 LHArc 0.33
Hermes 1.01 StuffIt Classic 1.6
FBBS 0.91 Compactor 1.21
TImport 1.92
TExport 1.92
Timestamp 1.6
Tset 1.3
Import 3.2
Export 3.21
Sundial 3.2
PreStamp 3.2
OriginatorII 2.0
AreaFix 1.6
Mantissa 3.21
Zenith 1.5
FidoNews 8-10 Page 27 11 Mar 1991
Eventmeister 1.0
TSort 1.0
Mehitable 2.0
UNZIP 1.02c
Amiga
-----
Bulletin Board Software Network Mailers Other Utilities
Name Version Name Version Name Version
Paragon 2.082+ BinkleyTerm 1.00 AmigArc 0.23
TransAmiga 1.05 TrapDoor 1.50 AReceipt 1.5
WelMat 0.42 booz 1.01
ConfMail 1.10
ChameleonEdit 0.10
ElectricHerald1.66
Lharc 1.30
MessageFilter 1.52
oMMM 1.49b
ParseLst 1.30
PkAX 1.00
PK[UN]ZIP 1.01
PolyxAmy 2.02
RMB 1.30
RoboWriter 1.02
Skyparse 2.30
TrapList 1.12
Yuck! 1.61
Zippy (Unzip) 1.25
Zoo 2.01
Atari ST/TT
-----------
Bulletin Board Network Node List
Software Version Mailer Version Utilities Version
FIDOdoor/ST 2.12* BinkleyTerm 2.40l* ParseList 1.30
QuickBBS/ST 1.02 The BOX 1.20 Xlist 1.12
Pandora BBS 2.41c EchoFix 1.20
GS Point 0.61 sTICk/Hatch 5.10*
LED ST 1.00
MSGED 1.96S
Archiver Msg Format Other
Utilities Version Converters Version Utilities Version
FidoNews 8-10 Page 28 11 Mar 1991
LHARC 0.60 TB2BINK 1.00 ConfMail 4.03
ARC 6.02 BINK2TB 1.00 ComScan 1.02
PKUNZIP 1.10 FiFo 2.1j* Import 1.14
OMMM 1.40
Pack 1.00
FastPack 1.20
FDsysgen 2.16
FDrenum 2.10
Trenum 0.10
Archimedes
----------
BBS Software Mailers Utilities
Name Version Name Version Name Version
ARCbbs 1.44 BinkleyTerm 2.03 Unzip 2.1TH
ARC 1.03
!Spark 2.00d
ParseLst 1.30
BatchPacker 1.00
+ Netmail capable (does not require additional mailer software)
* Recently changed
Utility authors: Please help keep this list up to date by
reporting new versions to 1:1/1. It is not our intent to list
all utilities here, only those which verge on necessity.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FidoNews 8-10 Page 29 11 Mar 1991
=================================================================
NOTICES
=================================================================
Software John 1:143/8
In late June I will be boarding a plane bound for England.
Once in England, I will retrieve my motorcycle from Customs
(shipped over seperately) and proceed across the channel to
France, and up to Assen, Holland to attend the Holland GP
motorcycle race.
After the race, I have a bit over two weeks of holiday, and
plan to ride through parts of France, Switzerland, Austria,
and wherever else the urge takes me.
I would consider it a great pleasure to have the opportunity
to meet fellow SysOps during my holiday travels. If any of you
in Europe reading this would like a visit from a California
Yankee, please let me know. I am going to try to brush up my
French during the next three months, but don't expect fluency!
<grin>
Thanks!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Interrupt Stack
30 Mar 1991
Jim Grubs (W8GRT) was issued his first ham radio license forty
years ago today. His first station was made from an ARC-5
"Command Set" removed from a B-17 bomber.
12 May 1991
Fourth anniversary of FidoNet operations in Latin America and
second anniversary of the creation of Zone-4.
15 Aug 1991
5th annual Z1 Fido Convention - FidoCon '91 "A New Beginning"
Sheraton Denver West August 15 through August 18 1991.
8 Sep 1991
25th anniversary of first airing of Star Trek on NBC!
7 Oct 1991
Area code 415 fragments. Alameda and Contra Costa Counties
will begin using area code 510. This includes Oakland,
Concord, Berkeley and Hayward. San Francisco, San Mateo,
Marin, parts of Santa Clara County, and the San Francisco Bay
FidoNews 8-10 Page 30 11 Mar 1991
Islands will retain area code 415.
1 Feb 1992
Area code 213 fragments. Western, coastal, southern and
eastern portions of Los Angeles County will begin using area
code 310. This includes Los Angeles International Airport,
West Los Angeles, San Pedro and Whittier. Downtown Los
Angeles and surrounding communities (such as Hollywood and
Montebello) will retain area code 213.
1 Dec 1993
Tenth anniversary of Fido Version 1 release.
5 Jun 1997
David Dodell's 40th Birthday
If you have something which you would like to see on this
calendar, please send a message to FidoNet node 1:1/1.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron Goldblatt
1:130/20.1102 FidoNet
20:491/223.0 MailNet
45:200/52.0 RatNET
Sean Donahue
1:130/20.1104 FidoNet
No, no, it can't be!
NOT ANOTHER BBS System?
The Triple Helix Development Team is looking for a few good
people. Maybe you are one of them.
The Triple Helix Bulletin Board System will be a new type of
BBS, offering a host of capabilities that have previously been
available only through the use of a multitude of programs.
Triple Helix will offer full FidoNet compatability, echomail,
GroupMail, and netmail processing capabilities, and an
innovative sysop and user interface, plus much more.
If you are interested in becoming a part of the Triple Helix
Development Team you can FREQ some information on how. Request
TRIPINFO from 1:130/28.0 and you will get it...HST/v.32 with
FrontDoor v2.0.
Thanks for your attention...have a day. :-)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
---
Remember Campers!!!
To send mail from an Internet site or smart UUCP Site TO a user
that calls a Fido-Net system.
You need to know the name of the person and node number of the
Fido-Net system that the person uses.
The address of a FidoNode looks like this: 1:105/302.0. Usually
the 1: and .0 are left off, but they are there by default. (In
Europe it is 2: and in the Pacific Basin it is 3:.) That
address can be translated as "Zone 1, Net 105, FidoNode 302,
Point 0." or p0.f302.n105.z1. Add the FidoNet domain of
.fidonet.org to the end of that, chop off the p0 (it is again,
a default) and you have f302.n105.z1.fidonet.org - the "Fully
Qualified Domain Name" of a FidoNode. Another example is
1:105/4.3 which would be written as p3.f4.n105.z1.fidonet.org
(since there is a point number other than 0, we have to specify
it). Note also that we are only using zone 1. This will also
work for zones 2 and 3, just use z2 or z3 as appropriate.
FidoNet uses full names of the callers. Multi-part name folks
(eg. First Last, ie. "Dale Weber") will have a period '.'
seperating their names. So, lets say you wanted to send mail
to Dale Weber at 1:105/55.0, you would address your letter to:
Dale.Weber@f55.n105.z1.fidonet.org.
**********************************************************************
Submissions to comp.org.fidonet should be addressed to
pozar@toad.com
**********************************************************************
--
pozar@lns.com Fido: 1:125/555 PaBell: 415-788-3904
USNail: KKSF-FM / 77 Maiden Lane / San Francisco CA 94108