jmm@bonnie.UUCP (Joe Mcghee) (06/27/84)
To: Mark Horton As of this date I have 28 favorable responses to the proposal to start net.micro.ti99 and 1 unfavorable response. I have listed the responses in a separate article to follow because of the length. The single unfavorable voter stated that he opposed the net because he said net.micro.ti already existed. If this net does exist, I can't find any trace of it; so that takes care of his objection. So, if you can find the time to open the net, I think we have a quorum. Thanx, Joe McGhee bonnie!jmm
smk@axiom.UUCP (Steven M. Kramer) (06/30/84)
Looks to me like all the people wanting net.micro.ti99 are from the same site/area. I would prefer to see a local (1 machine, 1 site, or 1 region) group set up in your area before setting up this group worldwide. -- --steve kramer {allegra,genrad,ihnp4,utzoo,philabs,uw-beaver}!linus!axiom!smk (UUCP) linus!axiom!smk@mitre-bedford (MIL)
gurr@west44.UUCP (Dave Gurr) (07/06/84)
< force of habit .. > One point that could easily be overlooked here is the physical location of most (or is it all ?) of the people who have voted for this group. They are overwhelmingly employees of BTL or AT&T. My point is that if this is and continues to be the case, create a LOCAL AT&T or BTL news group for ti99 users. The TI99 is (I think) now out of production, and due to the current proliferation of groups, I think we should be careful about introducing a group that may have a limited readership into WORLD distribution. Another option is to create a na.ti99 group ... the ti99 never was very popular over here (I shall now sit back and wait for the flames on that remark!) mcvax "You can't clean the \ toilet Neil, real students ukc!west44!gurr don't do that!" / vax135 Dave Gurr, Westfield College, Univ. of London, England.