bob@plus5.UUCP (Bob Simpson) (07/23/84)
:: > From: julian@deepthot (Julian Davies) > > A radical reorganization is fine by me, but I still want > to see a 'root' distinction made between the two major classes > of newsgroups -- (1) technically-oriented ones; and (2) others. > Class (1) includes unix-wizards, bugs, mail, etc etc. If we are splitting the net into worthy/unworthy groups, I would like net.games listed in the proposed 'technet' instead of the 'recnet' since I derive part of my income from gaming, and frequently find the dicussions in these groups a great way to kick off new ideas. I guess there is only one problem with this idea: Who gets to draw the line? -- How about net.heretic? -- bob@plus5 Bob Simpson ...!ihnp4!plus5!bob 765 Westwood Dr. St. Louis, MO 63105 314-725-9492
john@X.UUCP (John Woods) (07/25/84)
Well, I happen to enjoy all aspects of Computer Science, hence all discussions of computers, hardware, algorithms, and such must obviously go into the recreational subdivision! -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- John Woods, Charles River Data Systems, Framingham MA, (617) 626-1114 ...!decvax!frog!john, ...!mit-eddie!jfw, JFW@MIT-XX.ARPA I have absolutely nothing clever to say in this signature.