[net.news.group] I Propose Net.Love_Sex...

joe@zinfandel.UUCP (09/29/84)

<---------------------------------------------------------------------->

	Hello,

	I would like to propose a new net category, net.love_sex .

I believe we all have ideas and questions that fall most properly into 
this area. This is also one area where simple communication can easily
help, as well and entertain and excite. For those net readers who feel
that there is no correct attitude one can hold in order to profitably
discuss sex and love then this category would not be for them. If you
can envision a proper approach to discussing sexual matters, then that
is the way you should contribute to it. Of course others may have diff-
erent approaches, so one can expect occasional controversy. I think this
is the best thing the net can do for us, because it makes us think.
	There is a *chance* that this group might become the most often
read and enjoyed group. For that reason I think it should be given a
chance. I hope there aren't too many out there who feel we should censor
ourselves any more than creating the news group. We are adults, and no
one has to read this group. As a semi-public medium, are there any laws
to consider? If there are, let's state them, obey them and see what
happens.

		Joseph Weinstein
		Zehntel Inc.
		Walnut Creek, Ca.	415-932-6900

gam@amdahl.UUCP (Gordon A. Moffett) (10/02/84)

In the interests of trying not to create too many top-level groups:

       net.med.sex     - discussion of biological and behavioral aspects
                                 of human sexuality
       net.social.sex  - discussions of social, political and cultural
                                 aspects of human sexuality

The name 'net.love_sex' attempts to combine two concepts that are not
necessarily related.

Of course, we have net.singles and net.motss both of which discuss
aspects of human sexuality.
-- 
Gordon A. Moffett			...!{ihnp4,hplabs,amd,nsc}!amdahl!gam

[ The opinons expressed in this article are completely fictious.  Any
  similarity between these opinions and the opinions of any persons
  living or dead is entirely coincidental. ]

ag5@pucc-i (Henry C. Mensch) (10/07/84)

<<Pant! pant! pant!>>

	We *could* take this one step further and call the new
newsgroup net.lust . . . .

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Henry C. Mensch                 | Purdue University Computing Center
{decvax|ucbvax|sequent|icalqa|inuxc|uiucdcs|ihnp4}!pur-ee!pucc-i!ag5
--------------------------------------------------------------------
            " . . You'd better smile when they watch you,
                  smile like you're in control. . ."
                                 -- *Smile*, Was (Not Was)