jam@RADC-LONEX.ARPA (09/12/88)
alternate subject: Does TCP/IP "comform" to ISO/OSI? > I didn't hear (read) a second to the motion nor a call for a vote on the > motion. I might suffer withdrawal symptoms from contrived erudition and > misspelled words should you terminate your exchange of missives at this > instance. On the basis of the dispatches promulgated by yourself and > Marshall, one can only hope that English (American or British) is a second > language and that you can express yourselves more elegantly in Ada, ALGOL, > BASIC, BLISS (-16 or -32), C, COBOL, FORTRAN, LISP, JOVIAL, SNOBOL, WATFOR, > WATFIV, etc.. I probably should include TECO and any number of assemblers > in the preceding list. > > Merton I for one will second the motion, though I'm not sure if we could actually call for a vote. I don't really think that a forum on tcp-ip is the place to attack it. I'm here because I use tcp-ip (the fact that I like it is beside the point), and having to wade through language that only a supreme court justice enjoys is a drag. Joel P.S. SNOBOL is probably the best choice for communications, considering the rate this is expanding at... Merton, are the waitresses at Westlake Jack's still as awsome as they used to be?