dave@clsib21.UUCP (David P. Hansen) (10/18/88)
I am looking for support of tcp-ip on the DR11 interprocessor comm
board for Unix (sysV or Berkley). Anyone have any leads on a driver?
Thanks.
--
ONLY BIG BABIES David P. Hansen, CLSI, Inc.
ARE PRO-CHOICE! 320 Nevada Street
---------------- Newtonville, MA 02160
Internet: dave%clsib21.uucp@bbn.com UUCP: {...}bbn!clsib21!daveSHANE@UTDALVM1.BITNET (Shane Davis) (10/22/88)
> ONLY BIG BABIES David P. Hansen, CLSI, Inc. > ARE PRO-CHOICE! 320 Nevada Street > ---------------- Newtonville, MA 02160 >Internet: dave%clsib21.uucp@bbn.com UUCP: {...}bbn!clsib21!dave *FLAME ON* Why don't you set up your own distribution list if you wish to make such statements (right-to-life-request?)? I'm sure I'm not the only one who takes offense at having his mbox soiled with such unsolicited political crap. If we wanted to hear that, we would subscribe to right-to-life-request... I don't know, but might this even constitute misuse of the ARPAnet? *FLAME OFF* If I missed something (perhaps pro-choice means something else here? sure...), I apologize... --Shane Davis Systems Programmer, Univ. of Texas at Dallas Academic Computer Ctr. SHANE@UTDALVM1{.BITNET|.dal.utexas.edu}
bzs@BU-CS.BU.EDU (Barry Shein) (10/22/88)
>> ONLY BIG BABIES David P. Hansen, CLSI, Inc. >> ARE PRO-CHOICE! 320 Nevada Street >Why don't you set up your own distribution list if you wish to make such >statements (right-to-life-request?)? I'm sure I'm not the only one who takes >offense at having his mbox soiled with such unsolicited political crap. If >we wanted to hear that, we would subscribe to right-to-life-request... > >I don't know, but might this even constitute misuse of the ARPAnet? >--Shane Davis Although I disagree with the person's opinion vehemently I'll defend to the death his right to say it. If we tolerate innocuous remarks in net.signatures I'd say we have to tolerate comments we disagree with also, short of (perhaps) obscenities or commercialism which is not the issue here. That is, I find censorship the most offensive of obscenities, and the Constitution seems to agree. I find your appeal to police authority particularly stenchworthy. -Barry Shein, ||Encore|| Most so-called "pro-lifers" seem to believe a person has rights only up to the moment of birth. "If people won't listen to you what makes you think they'll listen to your T-shirt?" -- Fran Liebowitz
08071TCP@MSU.BITNET (Doug Nelson) (10/24/88)
>If we tolerate innocuous remarks in net.signatures I'd say we have to >tolerate comments we disagree with also, short of (perhaps) >obscenities or commercialism which is not the issue here. I certainly agree - "signatures" are easy enough to ignore, if you want to. >Most so-called "pro-lifers" seem to believe a person has rights only >up to the moment of birth. Besides being untrue, that's as least as offensive as the original signature! Why don't we declare both sides even and get back to the original purpose of this list? Doug Nelson These views are entirely my own, etc., etc.
bzs@BU-CS.BU.EDU (10/25/88)
Obviously I made my remarks as sarcastic counterpoint. -Barry Shein