[comp.protocols.tcp-ip] more IP

patterso@hardees.rutgers.edu (Ross Patterson) (03/13/89)

>Anyway, one concept they have come up with is to 'trick' IP into thinking
>that a bunch of datagrams are actually datagram fragments (by forcing the
>appropriate fields in the IP header).  They expect that IP on the receiving
>end will simply recognize the things as fragments, reconstruct, and hand
>the fully formed datagram off to the application.

I suppose you've already considered the fact that one of these 
"super-datagrams" might have several sets of TCP or UDP headers in them, due
to the conglomeration of "fragments" that the receiving IP will perform? I 
expect that will cause most TCP/IP implementations to become deathly ill. 

Ross Patterson
Rutgers University
Center for Computer and Information Services