[comp.protocols.tcp-ip] Most stupid 'mail' question of the year ?

af%sei.ucl.ac.be@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU ("Alain FONTAINE ", Postmaster - NAD) (05/11/89)

May I ask your indulgence for  this little request for information about
the  DDN mail  protocols  :  both RFC821  and  RFC822  limit the  usable
character set  to '128  ASCII characters'.  For RFC821,  this limitation
concerns  not only  the  envelope, but  also the  content  which is  not
interpreted at all,  except for looking for the 'CRLF  . CRLF' sequence.
For RFC822,  the limitation concerns not  only the header, but  also the
body which is not interpreted in any way.

Given the fact that TCP offers full octet transport, my stupid questions
are :

1- Are the limitations still specified (in order words, has there been a
   relaxation at some later time)?

2- If question 1 yields a  'yes', are those limitations in fact enforced
   by the implementations?

3- If question 2 also yields a 'yes',  why is it that one may not use an
   8 bit alphabet derived by extension from ASCII for mail (did somebody
   say 'ISO8859' out there ?) ?

I really hope I have overlooked  something, and would be delighted to be
corrected by anyone who knows better than me. Thanks.

Alain FONTAINE                       +--------------------------------+
Universite Catholique de Louvain     | If your mail software barks at |
Service d'Etudes Informatiques       | my address, you may try :      |
Batiment Pythagore                   |                                |
Place des Sciences, 4                |     FNTA80@BUCLLN11.BITNET     |
B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, BELGIUM     +--------------------------------+
phone +32 (10) 47-2625