[net.news.group] mod.flame

chongo@nsc.UUCP (Landon C. Noll) (10/18/84)

While we are on the subject, why not have a mod.flame.  Net.flame is
too full of repeated long dragged out discussions.  Mod.flame would
give a lower volume sample of things people flame about.

chongo <*smYle*> /\--/\
-- 
 ~ Why not make UN*X source be public domain? ~ 
					J. Alton 84'

ag5@pucc-i (Henry C. Mensch) (10/19/84)

<<>>

..>While we are on the subject, why not have a mod.flame.  Net.flame is
..>too full of repeated long dragged out discussions.  Mod.flame would
..>give a lower volume sample of things people flame about.
..>chongo <*smYle*> /\--/\

	Because *that* wouldn't be *any* fun. . .  :-)

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Henry C. Mensch  |  User Confuser |  Purdue University User Services
{decvax|ucbvax|sequent|icalqa|inuxc|uiucdcs|ihnp4}!pur-ee!pucc-i!ag5
--------------------------------------------------------------------
		     "Hit me with your laser beam!"

mwm@ea.UUCP (10/22/84)

/***** ea:net.news.group / nsc!chongo /  4:56 pm  Oct 18, 1984 */
While we are on the subject, why not have a mod.flame.  Net.flame is
too full of repeated long dragged out discussions.  Mod.flame would
give a lower volume sample of things people flame about.

chongo <*smYle*> /\--/\
-- 
 ~ Why not make UN*X source be public domain? ~ 
					J. Alton 84'
/* ---------- */

Ok - who do I apply to to start moderating (unmoderate? domoderate?) mod.flame?
Gee, just think - a flame list with no rational discussions, no celtic
stuff (a disjoint set from rational discussions), no politiking, no nuking,
etc.

Come to think of it, mod.jokes might not be a bad idea, either. To censor
out the jokes that have appeared before, and *only* to censor such jokes.
Said person could also make sure any offensive jokes were rotated [which
means in practice rotate everything that moves]. He would *not* censor jokes
because they were "not funny", or were "offensive".

	<mike

mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate) (10/24/84)

>  While we are on the subject, why not have a mod.flame.  Net.flame is
>  too full of repeated long dragged out discussions.  Mod.flame would
>  give a lower volume sample of things people flame about.
>  chongo <*smYle*> /\--/\

With rn, you don't need it moderated; rn has the long-awaited 'delete-by-
subject' command.

Charley Wingate   umcp-cs!mangoe

A member of the RN Political Action Committee