jhm+@andrew.cmu.edu (Jim Morris) (10/26/89)
The PostScript communication idea is being discussed on the PostScript bb now. Here is a sensible comment. ---------- Forwarded message begins here ---------- X-Andrew-WideReply: netnews.comp.lang.postscript X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 0;andrew.cmu.edu;Network-Mail Received: via nntppoll with nntp; Wed, 25 Oct 89 10:09:33 -0400 (EDT) Path: andrew.cmu.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-stat e.edu! gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!crdgw1!crdgw1.ge.com!barnett From: barnett@crdgw1.crd.ge.com (Bruce Barnett) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: PostScript in PostScript Keywords: graphical newsgroup Message-ID: <3566@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> Date: 25 Oct 89 13:28:23 GMT References: <7800@cg-atla.UUCP> Sender: news@crdgw1.crd.ge.com Reply-To: barnett@crdgw1.crd.ge.com (Bruce Barnett) Distribution: comp Organization: GE Corp. R & D, Schenectady, NY Lines: 13 In-reply-to: felleman@cg-atla.UUCP (John Felleman) %! ( <7800@cg-atla.UUCP> felleman@cg-atla (John Felleman) (Let's start a discussion about the feasibility and desirability of this concept.) CiteReference (There would be great benefit if there were a way of isolating libraries from data. That is, there should be a way of sending PostScript libraries ahead, so that once your machine received the library, you would be able to keep it around and avoid the cost of sending the library over and over and over again... ) ShowText BruceBarnett Signature