[comp.protocols.tcp-ip] milnet/nsfnet

stanonik@NPRDC.NAVY.MIL (Ron Stanonik) (02/03/90)

We recently needed to connect from a milnet site (nprdc.navy.mil)
to a cerfnet site (sdsu.edu) , and found delays were about ~30secs.
This is particularly annoying given that the sites are less than
5 miles apart.  The milnet/arpanet core gateways were redirecting
nprdc.navy.mil through reston-dcec-mb.ddn.mil; ie, both sites are
in San Diego CA, but at least one site was being redirected through
VA(?).

Admittedly the milnet is only 56kb and is now an unfashionable
backwater of the networking galaxy, but something seems very
wrong with the routing to produce delays of 1/2 minute.

Aside from the milnet noc, is there anyone else to query about
routing problems (an nsfnet noc?)?  Gone are the days when we
only needed to sort out routing with one or two gateways.

Is there an online description of the nsfnet topology?  Not that
it will help.

Thanks,

Ron Stanonik
stanonik@nprdc.navy.mil

prue@VENERA.ISI.EDU (02/06/90)

>We recently needed to connect from a milnet site (nprdc.navy.mil)
>to a cerfnet site (sdsu.edu) , and found delays were about ~30secs.
>This is particularly annoying given that the sites are less than
>5 miles apart.  The milnet/arpanet core gateways were redirecting
>nprdc.navy.mil through reston-dcec-mb.ddn.mil; ie, both sites are
>in San Diego CA, but at least one site was being redirected through
>VA(?).

>Admittedly the milnet is only 56kb and is now an unfashionable
>backwater of the networking galaxy, but something seems very
>wrong with the routing to produce delays of 1/2 minute.

I coordinate the routing within Los Nettos in the Los Angeles Area.  Los Nettos
and CERFnet have well coordinated routing and are well interconnected.  They
can be thought, topologically, to be the same regional network.  They are not
administratively the same but again are well coordinated.  Los Nettos advertises
sdsu.edu to the Arpanet and in particular to the mail bridge 

	MARINA-DEL-REY-MB.DDN.MIL  ==>  26.6.0.103  10.6.0.22
	
This mail bridge is co-located with a Los Nettos node and on the same PSN, #22,
on the Arpanet.

Within Los Nettos/CERFnet the route back is via full T1 to this mail bridge.
That is, the return path does not touch the NSFNET backbone.  I have no tools 
to tell me the path from your node towards sdsu.edu.  Right now the ping times
from the Los Nettos node co-located with the mail bridge, to sdsu.edu is 
averaging 182 ms.

I do know that MARINA-DEL-REY-MB.DDN.MIL has been unresponsive to pings at 
various times and may or may not have forwarded packets.

Walt Prue
213-822-1511

stanonik@NPRDC.NAVY.MIL (Ron Stanonik) (02/06/90)

Thanks for the info.

We're now getting redirects from the milnet/arpanet core to
route through marina-del-rey, instead of reston.  Coincidently(?)
rtt's are down to 500msec, which makes the connection usable.
Hmm, maybe someone unthreaded a routing knot along the way?

Thanks,

Ron
stanonik@nprdc.navy.mil

ps. If anyone's interested, this is the traceroute from nprdc.navy.mil
to sdsu.edu:

traceroute to sdsu.edu (130.191.229.14), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  MARINA-DEL-REY-MB.DDN.MIL (26.6.0.103)  241 ms  125 ms  152 ms
 2  10.0.0.22 (10.0.0.22)  180 ms  185 ms  170 ms
 3  ucla-gw.ln.net (130.152.64.2)  184 ms  394 ms  273 ms
 4  CERFnet-GW.UCLA.EDU (128.97.10.253)  169 ms  226 ms  172 ms
 5  sdsc-ucla.cerf.net (134.24.101.100)  402 ms  266 ms  261 ms
 6  134.24.220.101 (134.24.220.101)  477 ms  520 ms  630 ms
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
10  * * *
11  * * *
12  * * *
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  sdsu.edu (130.191.229.14)  451 ms !  615 ms !  815 ms !