[comp.protocols.tcp-ip] NTP

Anselmo-Ed@cs.yale.edu (Ed Anselmo) (04/11/90)

Speaking of ntp -- I've brought it up here on both Sun-4/60's and
Sun-4/390's.  You wouldn't think that there'd be all that much
difference between the machines, but ...

I'm using precision -7 and tickadj 5 on both machines.  The 4/60's
keep great time, but the 4/390's seem to have consistently greater
offsets -- the difference is about an order of magnitude.  Plus the
4/390's clutter up the console with silly warning messages whenever
the time is reset.

From a 4/60:

   (rem)  Address   (lcl)      Strat Poll Reach    Delay   Offset    Disp
==========================================================================
*CF-GW.CS.YALE.E 128.36.16.2       2   64  377      20.0     -7.0      2.0

From a 4/390:

   (rem)  Address   (lcl)      Strat Poll Reach    Delay   Offset    Disp
==========================================================================
-CF-GW.CS.YALE.E 128.36.0.21       2   64  376      20.0    188.0 127500.0
-ZOO-GW.CS.YALE. 128.36.0.21       3   64  376      30.0     91.0  63500.0

Would a different value for tickadj and/or precision work better with
the 4/390's?
--
Ed Anselmo   anselmo-ed@cs.yale.edu   {harvard,decvax}!yale!anselmo-ed

Mills@udel.edu (04/11/90)

Ed,

I can't help you a lot with the platform mechanics, but I do observe
the dispersion on the 4/390 is outta sight. The precision parameter
should not affect this, but the tickadj might; however, I would suspect
the culprit is lost clock interrupts. Others on this list might be
able to give more definitive anecdotal evidence. Ahem.

Dave