braden@VENERA.ISI.EDU (08/16/90)
The following IAB Report was published in the July 1990 Internet Monthly Report, which uses a somewhat restricted mailing list. We are hereby sending this same report to the Internet community. Bob Braden, for the IAB _________________________________________________________________________ IAB REPORT -- July 1990 The IAB held a two-day meeting at BBN in Cambridge, MA on June 28-29, 1990. The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) joined the second day of the meeting. A. INTERNET NUMBER REGISTRATION AND CONNECTED STATUS At this meeting, the IAB developed recommendations to the Federal Networking Council (FNC) on the procedures for registration of Internet network and autonomous system numbers, and concerning the notion of "connected status". These recommendations, which have been published in RFC-1174, were motivated by the increasing internationalization of the Internet. The IAB gratefully acknowledges the efforts of Elise Gerich of MERIT, who prepared early drafts of these recommendations for our consideration. Essentially, the IAB recommended that authority to assign IP network and autonomous system numbers be distributed on an international basis. A central registry (Internet Registry) would continue to allocate blocks of numbers, to avoid any duplication, but actual registration and assignment of numbers would be accomplished by delegated registries. The details of procedures, particularly the nomination of delegated registries, remain to be fully specified. The second recommendation concerned "connected status." The IAB recommended that this concept be retired, and that all networks which have been assigned Internet numbers be entered into the Domain Name System database(s) regardless of the status of their physical connectivity. In addition, for each network, a statement describing the nature of the traffic this network would inject into the Internet should be collected and stored by the Internet Registry and made available to all interested parties. This information would be used by network managers and operators to configure routing controls to accept or reject routes from networks, based on the type of traffic each network sends. It is important to note that this concept operates on route set-up and not on a per-packet basis. The Federal Networking Council has responded positively to these suggestions and is now considering various means to implement them. B. ANSI STANDARDIZATION Members of the IAB were also in attendance at an ANSI X3S3.3 meeting held on June 27 at Data General Corporation. The question of introducing the core TCP/IP protocols (IP,ICMP,UDP,TCP) into ANSI standardization was discussed at length. At the conclusion of the meeting, the proposal for introduction of the protocols was tabled, pending the formation of a joint IAB/ANSI working party to consider all of the ramifications that such a move might have on both ANSI and IAB procedures and prerogatives. The IAB considers it essential, for example, that any changes to these core protocols be subject to the same rigorous treatment that any Internet Protocol receives. In particular, implementation, testing and the availability of public domain implementations lie at the heart of the Internet Protocol standardization process but are largely outside the ANSI process. In the usual course of events within the ANSI environment, the introduction of a protocol for ANSI standardization transfers to ANSI all future authority for further evolution of the protocol. The IAB proposed a modus operandi which would leave the basic standardization activity within the Internet community, including resolution of any objections to standardization arising during ANSI balloting. Since this is not fully consistent with the ANSI rules as we now understand them, the matter requires further examination. C. RARE NETWORKSHOP The IAB agreed to participate in the planning of the RARE Networkshop now scheduled for May, 1991 in Blois, France. D. STANDARDS ACTIONS Following IESG recommendation, the IAB designated the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Initial Configuration Options as a Proposed Standard, and it was subsequently published in RFC-1172. The base PPP specification, a Draft Standard, was republished with minor updates as RFC-1171. The Simple File Transfer Protocol (SFTP, RFC-913) and the Resource Location Protocol (RFC-887) were moved from Proposed Standard to Experimental. These protocols, which had been labelled Proposed prior to last year's tightening of the Internet standards process, are not currently in the Internet standards track.