andrewf@syacus.acus.oz (Andrew Friedman) (09/12/90)
jim@cs.strath.ac.uk (Jim Reid) writes: [Lots of Good Stuff comparing CB and IP protocols deleted] >... Don't forget that telnet is functionally >superior to X.29: it offers more for roughly the same overheads. Are you sure about this? I would have said it the other way around, but I'll admit I don't know Telnet as well as X.29. What's the problem? Have you seen RFC 1053 which proposes adding X.3 parameters into Telnet? Andrew Note: Original article appeared in uk.misc,eunet.followup also. I can't post to these.