[comp.protocols.tcp-ip] TCP/IP

jimk@iscuva.ISCS.COM (Jim Kendall) (06/15/88)

OHH!!! I forgot to ask..........

Has anyone got TCP/IP working on their eniac yet????


(That's a joke, son.......      :-)

Cheers!
-- 
Jim Kendall                 ISC Systems Corp.          My boss is in full
jimk@iscuva.ISCS.COM        E. 22425 Appleway          agreement with all
uunet!iscuva!jimk           Liberty Lake, WA  99019    of my opinions....

LAWS@rsre.mod.UK (John Laws, on UK.MOD.RSRE) (06/16/88)

Jim,
 
'...eniac...'   Hmmmmm.... in the spirit of competition and keeping
the UK ahead of the game - I'll race down to the Science Museum London
and hack TCP/IP onto the Babbage m/c ...... now where did I put my
hacksaw (agreed a weak pun). Those of you strong on theory might like
to try it on the Turing m/c - US folks would rather go to Church and
Post a solution, or in these days of detente why not chain yourself
to A Markov.
 
Wales is a whisper away from here so don't be surprised if you hear
on the news come 21/22 June that Stonehenge, after Hoyle (Fred and
not the American maker of Rules quoted in a song), has been re-
programmed with Theological Cosmic Prayer/Inter-galatic Protocol.
 
John

steve@NOTE.NSF.GOV (Stephen Wolff) (06/16/88)

128.91.2.22	eniac.seas.upenn.edu

<grin> 

steve@vlink01.UUCP (1770 MCI) (02/07/90)

I apologize for being so ignorant, but what is tcp-ip?  What is it run
on, is like uucp or what?

Thanks.


-- 
|UUCP Mail : osu-cis!vlink01!steve     |Vlink                |
|MCI Mail  : uucp!mcimail.com!368-5882 |Steven E. Frazier    |      
|ATT Mail  : attmail!vlink01!steve     |1828 Darrow Drive    |
|Voice Mail: 614-755-3772              |Powell, Ohio  43065  |

PETEHIC@UOTTAWA.BITNET (Pete Hickey) (02/09/90)

>I apologize for being so ignorant, but what is tcp-ip?  What is it run
>on, is like uucp or what?

Yeah, its kind of like UUCP, but more powerful.  It runs on lots of
machines.

=======================================================================
Pete Hickey                     | Convention says that something funny
University of Ottawa            | goes here.  Its blank because I have
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA         | nothing funny to say.
(613) 564-7646                  |_____________________________________
    petehic@uotacdvm.uottawa.CA      PETEHIC@UOTTAWA.BITNET

oberman@rogue.llnl.gov (Oberman, Kevin) (02/09/90)

In article <90Feb8.205744est.58593@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>, PETEHIC@UOTTAWA.BITNET (Pete Hickey) writes...
> 
>>I apologize for being so ignorant, but what is tcp-ip?  What is it run
>>on, is like uucp or what?
> 
>Yeah, its kind of like UUCP, but more powerful.  It runs on lots of
>machines.

*Sigh* I hate seeing this sort of fairly useless answer, but it is (a little)
better than nothing, I suppose.

TCP/IP (tcp-ip, IP/TCP, ...) is the most common name for the DOD Network
Protocol suite. It was originally developed in the seventies by a community of
people under the auspices of ARPA, a DOD research agency. (Maybe ARPANET sounds
familiar.)

TCP is Tranmission Control Protocol and IP is Internet Protocol, making tcp-ip
a poor name. TCP is often not used. But its use is so nearly universal that I
don't see the point in fighting it.

TCP/IP includes a rich networking environment which include remote login
(TELNET), file transfer (FTP), electronic mail (SMTP), network management
(SNMP) and lots of other stuff. The standards are under continual revision and
expansion, so today's TCP/IP bears little similarity to that of a decade ago.
Even so, they may well interoperate.

Because TCP/IP was developed with government money and is not tied to any
single vendor it has become the defacto standard for multi-vendor networking
and is available from at least dozens, if not hundreds of vendors for virtually
any computer system from an PC to a Cray. It is also the standard network for
almost all Unix(tm) based systems.

While its capabilities are nowhere near as advanced as the proposed OSI
protocols (no flames, please), TCP/IP has two significant advantages. It's here
and available NOW and in use on well over 100,000 systems and it works. OSI
implementations are just coming into being and many important standards for OSI
are still under development.

UUCP (Unix(tm) to Unix(tm) Copy Program (as I recall)) is a fairly primative
but simple to implement communications method designed for the sole purpose of
copying a file from one system to another. It has since been adapted for E-Mail
use. UUCP is easy to set up and maintain, but is very limited in its
capabilities. It is usually used over low speed, dial-up lines and often
requires explicit (bang style) routing information.

I suspect I could sontinue with this for a week or so, but I think I've
described the most significant things involved.

					R. Kevin Oberman
					Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
					Internet: oberman@icdc.llnl.gov
   					(415) 422-6955

Disclaimer: Don't take this too seriously. I just like to improve my typing
and probably don't really know anything useful about anything. Also, my spell
checker won't work in NEWS. Got to fix that sometime!

cb@sequoia.execu.com (Christopher D. Brown) (10/12/90)

Execucom is building an MS Windows 3.0 software product 
which supports TCP/IP using the socket library model.  
Frankly, we were hoping that Sun would have already 
delivered the supporting network software ...  In any case, 
we need to get on with this aspect of the project and are 
looking for commercial software supporting TCP/IP via 
sockets under Windows 3 (including 386 enhanced mode).

I am doubtful about using the public domain software so 
frequently discussed here.  This route would seem to require 
a good deal more technical expertise than a commercial 
package.  A commercial package would also seem to reduce 
legal difficulties when reselling the software.  Is this too 
conservative?

"Network Windows (TM) Software Development Kit" from 
Distinct Corporation in Saratoga, CA claims to meet my 
requirements.  I would appreciate hearing from anyone who 
has experience with this product and/or company.  Pointers 
to alternate products would be gratefully accepted.

If there appears to be any interest, I post any alternate 
vendors and product reviews.

Thanks in advance.

Chris
-- 
Christopher D. Brown

Digital: {uunet|cs.utexas.edu}!execu!cb
Analog: (512) 327-7070
Physical: Execucom, 108 Wild Basin Road, Two Wild Basin, Austin, TX 78764