[comp.protocols.tcp-ip] forward igp?

medin@NSIPO.NASA.GOV ("Milo S. Medin", NASA ARC NSI Project Office) (12/15/90)

Well, actually, at the last router requirements meeting I suggested that
RIP and all routing protocols which broadcast updates should require
the TTL of the outgoing packets to be set to 1.  This will result in
a TTL expiration if a router attempts to forward it.  

In OSPF, we multicast instead of broadcast, so normally, routers not running
the protocol will never see the traffic.  However, in the case that someone
has a bug in their multicast support, they might still try and 
forward it, which is why we also specified all multicasts should have
a IP TTL of 1.  Sure enough, we ran into someone who had such a bug about
a month ago, and the only thing that prevented it from trying to forward
the datagram was the TTL being set to 1.  

In general, routing packets should never be forwarded, but because of 
problems with certain implementations not being able to tell if a particular
packet came in via a media level multicast, you can still run into trouble.
This is why the setting of the TTL to 1 is a good idea.


						Thanks,
						   Milo