tjs@MSC.EDU (Tim Salo) (02/08/91)
> However, the original question did not indicate whether the proposed > solution was a public X.25 network or a private X.25 network. I am about to stand corrected, (the proposed solution was a public X.25 network). > If the proposed solution is a private, (rather than public), X.25 network, > then per-packet charges are most likely not an issue.
mni@techops.cray.com (Michael Nittmann) (02/08/91)
you cannot say "public X.25 networks charge per packet": all of them are different in their charging structures. Most charge by packet, some add connection establishment charges, some have additional connection duration charges, some have distance dependent charges some all of the above, some have flat rates per month. PLEASE: if YOU YOURSELF did not enquiredo net disseminate incorect information! michael