meb@ee.mu.OZ.AU (Matthew Barry) (02/20/91)
Can anyone tell me which operating systems have implementions of TCP/IP using streams modules? Thanks in advance, Matthew Barry
thomas@nexus.se (02/21/91)
In article <MEB.91Feb20105117@orac.ee.mu.OZ.AU> meb@ee.mu.OZ.AU (Matthew Barry) writes:
Can anyone tell me which operating systems have implementions of
TCP/IP using streams modules?
I have a related question.
I'm in dire need of a TCP/IP streams implementation where I can separate
TCP and IP.
I've been checking WIN/TCP 3.1.0 for the 386 and it is streams only
above TCP.
The WIN/TCP drivers seems to be layered much like a streams stack. Are the
interfaces between the layers open and would it be feasible to put a packet
level module between TCP and IP in these drivers?
Znks.
Thomas
--
Real life: Thomas Tornblom Email: thomas@nexus.se
Snail mail: Communicator Nexus Phone: +46 18 171814
Box 857 Fax: +46 18 696516
S - 751 08 Uppsala, Swedenmjhammel@Kepler.dell.com (Michael J. Hammel) (02/22/91)
In article <MEB.91Feb20105117@orac.ee.mu.OZ.AU>, meb@ee.mu.OZ.AU (Matthew Barry) writes: > Can anyone tell me which operating systems have implementions of > TCP/IP using streams modules? The sockets implementation of TCP/IP is done in a STREAMS framework (as stated in the AT&T System V Release 4 Programmer's Guide: Networking Interfaces) for System V Release 4. I believe ISC's TCP/IP (1.1.2 and 1.2 that I know of) package is also done over streams, but am not completely sure of that. Michael J. Hammel | mjhammel@{Kepler|socrates}.dell.com Dell Computer Corp. | {73377.3467|76424.3024}@compuserve.com #include <disclaim/std> | zzham@ttuvm1.bitnet | uunet!uudell!feynman!mjhammel #define CUTESAYING "Lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way."