yuko@dbaccess.com (Yuko Tanaka) (05/17/91)
Does anybody know TCP/IP software which runs on VM (CMS or GCS) and
has socket interface to application? SAS C interface is the best for
us.
IBM TCP/IP for VM (R1.2) does not have socket interface and also
requires IBM C for System/370 (we are calling White Smith C) which we don't
want to use.
--
Yuko Tanaka INTERNET: yuko@dbaccess.com V V
c/o DB Access Inc. UUCP: {uunet,mips}!troi!yuko == . . ==
2900 Gordon Avenue, Suite 101 FAX: (408) 735-0328 === o ===
Santa Clara, CA 95051 TEL: (408) 735-7545 === v ===wbrand@krishna.shearson.com (Willy Brandsdorfer) (05/22/91)
In article <419@worf.dbaccess.com> yuko@dbaccess.com (Yuko Tanaka) writes: > Does anybody know TCP/IP software which runs on VM (CMS or GCS) and > has socket interface to application? SAS C interface is the best for > us. > > IBM TCP/IP for VM (R1.2) does not have socket interface and also > requires IBM C for System/370 (we are calling White Smith C) which we don't > want to use. TCP/IP Version 2 supports a normal socket interface. I think you need to use IBM C. I'm not an expert on this but I believe you can link this to SAS/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ William Brandsdorfer | UUCP: !uunet!shearson.com!wbrand Lehman Brothers | ARPA: wbrand@shearson.com 388 Greenwich St. | Voice: (212) 464-3835 New York, N.Y. 10013 | Yell: "Hey Willy" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
mah@wu-wien.ac.at (Michael Haberler) (05/30/91)
In article <WBRAND.91May22095443@krishna.shearson.com>, wbrand@krishna.shearson.com (Willy Brandsdorfer) writes: |> TCP/IP Version 2 supports a normal socket interface. I think you need to use |> IBM C. I'm not an expert on this but I believe you can link this to SAS/C |> Well, normal. I does have connect(), but it doesnt have accept(), at least last time I checked (I checked thoroughly, because I wrote a tape server for VM). Seems like they implemented the bare minimum so they could link Xlib. - michael -- Michael Haberler mah@wu-wien.ac.at, mah@awiwuw11.bitnet University of Economics and Business Administration A-1090 Vienna, Augasse 2-6 Biz: +43 (1) 31336 x4796 Fax: 347-555 Home: +43 (1) 961-679 (voice & fax) D-Netz: +43 (663) 811-056
rubin@watson.ibm.com (Bill Rubin) (05/31/91)
In <1991May29.222536.14957@swdsrv.edvz.univie.ac.at> mah@wu-wien.ac.at (Michael Haberler) writes: > In article <WBRAND.91May22095443@krishna.shearson.com>, wbrand@krishna.shearson. > > |> TCP/IP Version 2 supports a normal socket interface. I think you need to use > |> IBM C. I'm not an expert on this but I believe you can link this to SAS/C > |> > > Well, normal. I does have connect(), but it doesnt have accept(), at least > last time I checked (I checked thoroughly, because I wrote a tape server > for VM). > > Seems like they implemented the bare minimum so they could link Xlib. Well, you haven't checked recently, since our TCP/IP Version 2 for VM (and MVS) both have fairly complete socket implementations, including accept(). VM V2 has been out since last November, MVS V2 was available this March. -- Bill Rubin IBM TJ Watson Research
NJG@CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL.EDU ("Nick Gimbrone ", WIRDI: Whatever Is Right, Do It) (05/31/91)
> IBM TCP/IP for VM (R1.2) does not have socket interface and also >requires IBM C for System/370 (we are calling White Smith C) which we don't IBM TCP/IP v2 for VM does include a socket interface for IBM C/370. I suspect it would either work w/ other Cs or could be made to do so without too much hassle (though I've not done so). I have used the interface w/ C/370 and can state that it works.
lim@slc6.INS.CWRU.Edu (Hock Koon Lim) (05/31/91)
In article <WBRAND.91May22095443@krishna.shearson.com> wbrand@aries.shearson.com writes: >> Does anybody know TCP/IP software which runs on VM (CMS or GCS) and >> has socket interface to application? SAS C interface is the best for >> us. >> >> IBM TCP/IP for VM (R1.2) does not have socket interface and also >> requires IBM C for System/370 (we are calling White Smith C) which we don't >> want to use. Is anyone has any network printing solution for IBM TCP/IP with MVS over Ethernet? I am tring to find a solution for MVS/CICS printing over the campus network. Currently, all the CICS printers have to attach to the IBM7171 box. All the MVS/CICS users are using the TN3270 on a PC with ethernet interface to communicate with the Mainframe. However, we would like to bring the CICS printer closer to them. Maybe through lpr/lpd if there is a way on the IBM TCP/IP for MVS. I would like to know all your suggestions. Thanks, -- Hock-Koon Lim, Information Network services Case Western Reserve University; Cleveland, Ohio, USA 44106 (216) 368-2982 lim@ins.cwru.edu
ROMANO@IVRUNIV.BITNET (Romano Rosponi) (06/01/91)
Have I read right ?
Is there a TCP/IP version 2 for VM ?
(IBM has just offered us a TCP/IP V1.2 for VM).
staying in doubt...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Romano Rosponi +39 45 8098 474
CCCCC IIIII CCCCC AAAAA Centro di Informatica e Calcolo Automatico
C I C A A Universita' degli Studi di Verona
C I C AAAAA Via dell'Artigliere 19, 37100 VERONA - ITALY
CCCCC IIIII CCCCC A A
ROMANO@IVRUNIV.BITNET
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------NJG@CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL.EDU ("Nick Gimbrone ", WIRDI: Whatever Is Right, Do It) (06/03/91)
> Is anyone has any network printing solution for IBM TCP/IP with MVS
Version 2 of the IBM TCP/IP code for VM and MVS include lpr/lpd support.RAF@CU.NIH.GOV ("Roger Fajman") (06/03/91)
> > Is anyone has any network printing solution for IBM TCP/IP with MVS > Version 2 of the IBM TCP/IP code for VM and MVS include lpr/lpd support. That's incorrect. Only the VM version has it. It's only a "future direction" for the MVS version. Interlink's SNS/TCPaccess for MVS has an LPD server.
rubin@watson.ibm.com (Bill Rubin) (06/06/91)
In <9106021941.AA11777@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> NJG@CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL.EDU ("Nick Gimbrone ", WIRDI: Whatever Is Right, writes: > > Is anyone has any network printing solution for IBM TCP/IP with MVS > Version 2 of the IBM TCP/IP code for VM and MVS include lpr/lpd support. Sorry, Nick, you're only half correct. VM V2 does have LPR/LPD, but for MVS V2, all we announced was a 'Statement of Direction'. That is IBMese for "we don't have it (LPR/LPD) now, but we're going to in the future". -- Bill rubin@watson.ibm.com IBM TJ Watson Research
rubin@watson.ibm.com (Bill Rubin) (06/06/91)
In <9106011041.AA23847@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> ROMANO@IVRUNIV.BITNET (Romano Rosponi) writes: > Have I read right ? > Is there a TCP/IP version 2 for VM ? > (IBM has just offered us a TCP/IP V1.2 for VM). > > staying in doubt... IBM's TCP/IP V1 for VM (product number 5798-FAL) was withdrawn from marketing in the US on 12/28/90, as announced on 6/19/90. Outside of the US, it may have been a bit later, but I'd be very surprised if V1 was still orderable. The replacement product number is 5735-FAL. Perhaps your IBMers just have their terminology wrong? Even people here in development mistakenly still call it Release 2 instead of Version 2. -- Bill rubin@watson.ibm.com IBM TJ Watson Research