gcd@reading.ac.uk (Garfield Dean) (04/21/89)
In article <BOB.89Apr19173149@allosaur.cis.ohio-state.edu> bob@allosaur.cis.ohio-state.edu (Bob Sutterfield) writes: > What interpretive language would you like to use to interact with your > windows? PostScript and X11 are already done. How about Common Lisp? > Smalltalk? Forth? Prolog? APL? I would like to use Pop11 with NeWS. (For a review of Pop11 see Byte, May 1988). Pop has lisp-like functionality, but with Pascal style syntax. It is a stack based language and includes data items which are like dictionaries, arrays and objects. Like NeWS it is fun to program with. I feel that this would be a useful and interesting combination. Garfield Dean.
greg@cantuar.UUCP (G. Ewing) (04/24/89)
Bob Sutterfield (bob@allosaur.cis.ohio-state.edu) writes: >What interpretive language would you like to use to interact with your >windows? Scheme. Greg Ewing Internet: greg@cantuar.uucp Spearnet: greg@nz.ac.cantuar Telecom: +64 3 667 001 x8357 UUCP: ...!{watmath,munnari,mcvax,vuwcomp}!cantuar!greg Post: Computer Science Dept, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand Disclaimer: The presence of this disclaimer in no way implies any disclaimer.