[comp.windows.news] performance comparisons, anyone?

rws@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Bob Scheifler) (09/15/89)

Recently, Digital released something called "x11perf", which attempts to
measure various aspects of server performance.  It strikes me that the
majority of these tests are not unique to X (e.g. most aren't bitblt, and
most just do "paint" operations), and would translate quite readily into
the NeWS environment.  I'm wondering if anyone out there would be interested
in redoing x11perf for NeWS.  It really isn't that much code, and shouldn't
take too long for someone familiar with NeWS.  It would even be interesting
to have two versions of some of the tests, one "over the wire" and one
"send the algorithm across" in order to provide some measure of whether
downloading really helps.  x11perf is already being run against X11/NeWS
servers, and inevitably there will be arguments about whether going through
the X11 interpreter is or isn't reflecting the "true" performance of NeWS.
A NeWS version could help.

Any takers?