johnl@ima.UUCP (05/30/87)
I would like to claim a small prize for possibly the most useless piece of
syntax ever implemented. I just discovered that I had (mechanically) provided
the following grammar rule in our Cobol-85 compiler under development:
CALL PROGRAM id [USING ids]
[ON EXCEPTION imp-stmnt]
[NOT ON EXCEPTION imp-stmnt]
[END-CALL]
where CALL PROGRAM is a chaining statement, like the Unix exec().
The NOT ON EXCEPTION branch is obviously utterly unreachable.
Incidentally,
I am interested in corresponding with other Cobol-85 implementors.
--
Esmond Pitt, Austec International Ltd
...!seismo!munnari!ausmelb!ejp,ejp@ausmelb.oz.au
[Aw, shucks, I've seen worse. Interesting submissions as always solicited.
-John]
--
Send compilers articles to ima!compilers or, in a pinch, to Levine@YALE.ARPA
Plausible paths are { ihnp4 | decvax | cbosgd | harvard | yale | cca}!ima
Please send responses to the originator of the message -- I cannot forward
mail accidentally sent back to compilers. Meta-mail to ima!compilers-request