srt@CS.UCLA.EDU (05/05/87)
A story my father once told me: A neophyte farmer purchased a mule, but when he got home and hooked it up to the plow, the mule refused to move. Baffled, he called his next door neighbor. The neighbor, a seasoned country boy, came over and inspected the recalcitrant mule. He looked around the barnyard and found a 2x4, walked over to the mule and gave it a tremendous blow between the ears. ``First,'' he said, ``you get his attention...'' David Hayes took me to task for not following the protocol for creating a new newsgroup; like others in this group he apparently doesn't bother to actually read anything posted here or he would know that I did follow the protocol - to no effect. However, now that I have your attention, let me repeat my proposal for comp.sources.apollo: NAME comp.sources.apollo TOPIC To be used for distribution of software for Apollo workstations. MOD? Yes, by srt@ucla, who currently maintains the Rhapsody Archive of public-domain Apollo software. ALTERNATIVES? I've considered using an existing news group, like comp.sources.misc or news.groups :-). There are several problems with this: (a) it seems silly to have two people moderating sources for the Apollos. (b) many people uninterested in Apollo software would be forced to receive it and 'n' through it. (c) a moderator without an Apollo cannot test or debug submitted software. (d) moderators for other sources groups probably don't want all kinds of strange duties dumped on them. A mailing list is another possibility. I've been keeping a private mailing list for the Rhapsody Archive, and it has grown unreasonable and unreliable. I have difficulty mailing sources through UUCP and BITNET connections even when individual files are kept under 32K. For these reasons I think a new newsgroup is the best solution. NEED? I split this into two questions: ``Is there enough Apollo software to make this viable?'' and ``Are there enough interested readers in Netland?'' In answer to the first question, the Rhapsody Archive has a fair number of programs already (several Meg worth) and I get a submission or two a month, and I expect submissions will increase as the software gets wider distribution. In answer to the second question, there is already an active newsgroup for the Apollo community (mod.computers.apollo) and approximately 50 sites that receive software in one form or another from the Rhapsody Archive. I've requested numbers from the maintainer of the Apollo mailing list and from Brian Reid (for estimate of readership of mod.computers.apollo) and I'll post that information here when I receive it, but I think that the need has already been sufficiently proven. Certainly comp.sources.apollo is as reasonable as some existing newsgroups, though I realize that isn't a criterion. RESPONSES I've had about 10 responses, all in favor of creating the newsgroup (but I haven't requested responses from the people reading mod.computers.apollo). I also had a few responses about my 2x4 tactics; with the exception of Melinda Shore, who didn't realize that I wasn't really going to keeping posting sources to news.groups, they all approved. Which goes to show in what high regard the news adminstrators are held these days. Must be all those disgruntled mod.recipes readers :-). -- Scott R. Turner Moderator, comp.sources.apollo, appearing in news.group ARPA: srt@ucla UUCP: ...!{cepu,ihnp4,trwspp,ucbvax}!ucla-cs!srt