scott@csis.oz (Scott Milton) (06/05/89)
Re: Bug in sr10.1 sendmail. PROBLEM: Running "/usr/lib/sendmail -bt" on my SR10.1 system produces a segmentation error. The story from Apollo is that they know there is a problem, and they are looking into it. I haven't been able to send any messages since installing SR10.1. (I'm sending this from a Sun). Does anyone out there know of a fix or workaround for this? -- ACSnet: scott@csis.oz Scott MILTON (ph +61-62-750923) email: scott@csis.oz.au (fax +61-62-571052) CSIRO Division of Information Technology, Acton, Canberra. ACT. AUSTRALIA.
freedman@cpsc.ucalgary.ca (Dan Freedman) (06/08/89)
In article <215@csis.oz> scott@csis.oz (Scott Milton) writes: > >PROBLEM: Running "/usr/lib/sendmail -bt" > on my SR10.1 system produces a segmentation error. Hmm, on our system, /usr/lib/sendmail -bt seems to work ok. The date on the program is Oct 21, 1988, and the program is 114057 bytes long according to an ls -l. We are running SR 10.1 (BSD) on 4500s. Dan Freedman University of Calgary Computer Science Department 2500 University Drive N.W. freedman@cpsc.UCalgary.CA Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4 ...!alberta!calgary!freedman
pcc@apollo.COM (Peter Craine) (06/09/89)
PROBLEM: Running "/usr/lib/sendmail -bt" on my SR10.1 system produces a segmentation error. Have you run newaliases? If you do a "tb" you will probably find that sendmail is looking at the aliases.pag and aliases.dir files (rdb versions of aliases; these are created when you run newaliases) Those files probably exist and are empty or contain garbage. Running newaliases has fixed every sendmail segmentation fault I have ever seen. (how's that for a grandiose statement?) Peter Craine, NACS (soon to be a NARC) Disclaimers? We don't need no stinkin' disclaimers.
weiner@novavax.UUCP (Bob Weiner) (06/10/89)
In article <215@csis.oz> scott@csis.oz (Scott Milton) writes:
PROBLEM: Running "/usr/lib/sendmail -bt"
on my SR10.1 system produces a segmentation error.
The story from Apollo is that they know there is a problem, and they are
looking into it. I haven't been able to send any messages since installing
SR10.1. (I'm sending this from a Sun). Does anyone out there know of a fix
or workaround for this?
You have to run the program 'newaliases' on each node before sendmail
will work properly under SR10.1. We had the same problem and that
solved all segmentation errors; this was back in January. It's a shame
users remain uninformed by Apollo.
--
Bob Weiner, Motorola, Inc., USENET: ...!gatech!uflorida!novavax!weiner
(407) 738-2087
jnp@mjolner.tele.nokia.fi (J|rgen N|rgaard) (06/12/89)
In article <1341@novavax.UUCP> weiner@novavax.UUCP (Bob Weiner) writes: In article <215@csis.oz> scott@csis.oz (Scott Milton) writes: PROBLEM: Running "/usr/lib/sendmail -bt" on my SR10.1 system produces a segmentation error. [ etc ] You have to run the program 'newaliases' on each node before sendmail will work properly under SR10.1. We had the same problem and that solved all segmentation errors; this was back in January. It's a shame users remain uninformed by Apollo. I agree on the last point! Regards J|rgen N|rgaard ('|' is '\o{}' in \LaTeX{}) e-mail: jnp@tele.nokia.fi telephone: <..>-358-0-511-5671 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Regards J|rgen N|rgaard ('|' is '\o{}' in \LaTeX{}) e-mail: jnp@tele.nokia.fi telephone: <..>-358-0-511-5671 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thompson%animal.decnet@CIM-VAX.HONEYWELL.COM ("ANIMAL::THOMPSON") (06/13/89)
Return-Path: <postmaster@cim-vax.honeywell.com> Received: from cim-vax.honeywell.com by cim-vax.honeywell.com with SMTP ; Mon, 12 Jun 89 16:12:14 CST Date: 12 Jun 89 15:51:24 CST From: "SMTP MAILER" <postmaster@cim-vax.honeywell.com> Subject: Mail Delivery Problem To: "thompson" <thompson%animal.decnet@cim-vax.honeywell.com> ----Reason for mail failure follows---- Sending mail to host umich.cc.umix.edu : Unrecognized host name or address. ----Transcript of message follows---- Date: 12 Jun 89 15:43:00 CST From: "ANIMAL::THOMPSON" <thompson%animal.decnet@cim-vax.honeywell.com> Subject: Re: Bug in SR10.1 sendmail. To: "apollo" <apollo@umich.cc.umix.edu> You may not have a bug. You mmight have forgotten something.... When we were setting up sendmail (no, it's still not set up right in all ways), we had the same problem. Another person here (I won't grab the glory) talked w/ an Apollo Engineer who used to work here at SSEC (nice to have friends), and together they tracked it down. We needed to create the aliases database before sendmail would be willing to work. That's do-able by executing /usr/ucb/newaliases Hope it fixes you up.... John Thompson Honeywell, SSEC 12001 St Hwy 55 Plymouth, MN, 55441 thompson@animal.ssec.honeywell.com The above comments are my own, and have little to do with reality.