e07@nikhefh.nikhef.nl (Eric Wassenaar) (12/18/89)
(I did not completely follow the rgy discussion on the net, so my comments may not be new). In SR10 the rgy database seems to be network-wide. This is absolutely unacceptable if there are multiple groups of machines which are under separate administrative management, with different accounts, which must have different registries. In SR9 this was perfectly possible. On specific machines in our network, only a very limited number of accounts is allowed of the many accounts that are defined on other machines in the network. There is no way to do this with the distributed global database. Eric Wassenaar -- Organization: NIKHEF-H, National Institute for Nuclear and High-Energy Physics Address: Kruislaan 409, P.O. Box 41882, 1009 DB Amsterdam, the Netherlands Phone: +31 20 592 0412, Home: +31 20 909449, Telefax: +31 20 592 5155 Internet: e07@nikhef.nl
pcc@apollo.HP.COM (Peter Craine) (12/20/89)
In article <632@nikhefh.nikhef.nl>, e07@nikhefh.nikhef.nl (Eric Wassenaar) writes: > > In SR10 the rgy database seems to be network-wide. > This is absolutely unacceptable if there are multiple groups of > machines which are under separate administrative management, > with different accounts, which must have different registries. > In SR9 this was perfectly possible. This is quite possible under SR10.2 using NCS cells. See the documentation about this in the SR10.2 manual "Managing NCS software" +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Peter Craine + You Klingon son, you killed my bastard Hewlett-Packard + Chelsmford Response Center + *I* don't want my opinions. Why would HP?