[ont.events] Buffalo Logic Colloq: 2nd-order logic

rapaport@cs.buffalo.EDU (William J. Rapaport) (10/16/87)

                STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO

                        BUFFALO LOGIC COLLOQUIUM

                            STEWART SHAPIRO

           Philosophy and Mathematics, Ohio State University
                                  and
       Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh

           SECOND-ORDER LOGIC AND FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEMATICS

This paper discusses the role of  formal  semantics  in  describing  and
codifying practice.  The case study is the issue of the various semantic
systems for second-order logic.  It is argued that the debate is  likely
to  result  in  either  a  stand-off, with each side begging the central
question, or a regress.  The issue of second-order logic is  related  to
the Wittgensteinian critique of rule-following.  It is suggested, tenta-
tively, that the insistence on standard semantics, despite the possibil-
ity   of  Skolemite  misinterpretation,  is  closely  analogous  to  the
insistence that one is following a particular  rule,  despite  the  fact
that no finite amount of behavior excludes all alternatives.  (The paper
is substantially self-contained.  A beginning graduate course  in  logic
should suffice to follow it.)

                      Wednesday, October 28, 1987
                               4:00 P.M.
                     684 Baldy Hall, Amherst Campus

                            Future speakers:

          John Case (SUNY Buffalo and University of Rochester)
            Colin McLarty (Case Western Reserve University)
                       John Kearns (SUNY Buffalo)

    For further information, contact John Corcoran, (716) 636-2438.