[comp.sys.apollo] Loss of performance with SR10?

rabbe@infolog.se (Rabbe Fogelholm) (07/03/90)

Our system currently runs SR9.7, but we would like to upgrade to SR10.
However, HP/Apollo in Sweden has recommended that DN3000 nodes with 4
Mbyte of memory should be upgraded to 8 Mbyte.

How important is it to have 8 Mbyte per node? Most of our work consists
of text editing, Unix-style file manipulation, DSEE operations, and
DPCC sessions.

We also have a few DN300 and DSP80 nodes with just 2 Mbyte, doing
things like wbak and rnews. How will they perform under SR10 if we
insist on using them with 2 Mbyte?

--Rabbe Fogelholm, Infologics, Sollentuna, Sweden (rabbe@infolog.se)

krowitz%richter@UMIX.CC.UMICH.EDU (David Krowitz) (07/03/90)

4 Mb of memory on a DN3000 is ok for editing, text processing and the
like. If you are doing debugging (ie. using the Apollo DDE debugger) or
compiling on the node, you will want 8 Mb of memory. The SR10 debugger
is a memory hog, and the compilers will page thrash when compiling any
file of more than 100 to 200 lines of code on a 4 Mb machine.

We have booted 2 Mb diskless DN330's under SR10.2 and they are *slow*.
You can only work in one window at a time with any speed. Trying to
compile even a small program in one window while editing a file in
another is almost impossible due to the poor response of the DM editor.

In general, a 4 MB machine running SR10 acts more like a 2 Mb machine
running SR9.7, and a 2 MB machine running SR10 has the response of a
1 MB machine running SR9.7.


 -- David Krowitz

krowitz@richter.mit.edu   (18.83.0.109)
krowitz%richter.mit.edu@eddie.mit.edu
krowitz%richter.mit.edu@mitvma.bitnet
(in order of decreasing preference)