ylfink@water.waterloo.edu (ylfink) (09/16/88)
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO
SEMINAR ACTIVITIES
PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES
AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SEMINAR
- Thursday, September 22, 1988
Mr. Bijan Arbab, Department of Computer Science,
University of California, Los Angeles, California, will
speak on ``The Paradox of the Name Relation''.
TIME: 3:30 PM
ROOM: MC 5045
ABSTRACT
Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz makes use of the following
example to demonstrate a logical puzzle. We have the
two true premises:
1. Newton knew that 8 > 5.
2. The atomic number of oxygen = 8.
Hence, by the substitutive law of equality, using
premise 2 to substitute in premise 1, we infer
3. Newton knew that the atomic number of oxygen
> 5.
But the conclusion is clearly false. Must we therefore
abandon the substitutive law, or is there some less
drastic remedy?
September 16, 1988ylfink@water.waterloo.edu (ylfink) (09/20/88)
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO
SEMINAR ACTIVITIES
PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES
AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SEMINAR
- Thursday, September 22, 1988
Mr. Bijan Arbab, Department of Computer Science,
University of California, Los Angeles, California, will
speak on ``The Paradox of the Name Relation''.
TIME: 3:00 PM
ROOM: DC 1304
ABSTRACT
Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz makes use of the following
example to demonstrate a logical puzzle. We have the
two true premises:
1. Newton knew that 8 > 5.
2. The atomic number of oxygen = 8.
Hence, by the substitutive law of equality, using
premise 2 to substitute in premise 1, we infer
3. Newton knew that the atomic number of oxygen >
5.
But the conclusion is clearly false. Must we therefore
abandon the substitutive law, or is there some less
drastic remedy?
September 19, 1988